A Look At Fatalism and a Killer Virus in Twelve Monkeys

This posts dives into the film and TV series Twelve Monkeys and its predecessors and asks what we can learn from this story and the Bible about pandemics and fate.
on Mar 19, 2020 · 8 comments

Twelve Monkeys (or 12 Monkeys) is both the title of a 1995 film and also a 47 episode SyFy channel TV series that debuted in January of 2015 and ended in 2018. A caveat to my post here is that I’ve seen the 1995 movie though not the series and will mainly talk about the film, though I’m familiar with the series and will reference how its view of fatalism is different from its source material. Both the film and the series feature a virus that wipes out the vast majority of humanity. And both ponder the issue of whether it’s really possible to change fate. I’ll talk about what I believe the Bible has to say on that topic near the end.

By the way, some spoilers about the film are in this article–in case you’ve never seen it and were hoping to be surprised. (But that was 25 years ago–surely you’ve seen it by now, right? 🙂 )


Both versions of 12 Monkeys do something all my favorite science fiction does; they use the lives of characters to illustrate ideas, to deliberately get the viewer to thinking about what’s actually true. But pondering the nature of fate isn’t new with Twelve Monkeys, in fact, both stories make deliberate reference to the ancient Greek myth of Cassandra in the name of one of the main characters, Cassandra “Cassie” Railly. The myth of Cassandra, for those who may not be familiar with it, features the title figure of the myth being given the ability to accurately see the future by the god Apollo–but because she would not take the Pagan deity as her lover, he also cursed her so that no one would ever believe her prophecies of inevitable tragedy to come (her visions concerned the fall of Troy, by the way).

La Jetée

But Twelve Monkeys has a much more recent predecessor than Cassandra. Chris Marker in 1962 produced a short film in French called La Jetéewhich featured a central plot very similar to the 12 Monkeys movie. La Jetée is a time travel story from a post-apocalyptic (and rather dystopian) future, back to the past for the purpose of averting the apocalypse if possible. La Jetée by the way means “the jetty” as in a pier, but in French it can also be used to describe an observation platform–in this case it refers to such a platform in an airport, where a young version of the main character witnesses the inevitable demise of his older, time-traveling self. Note the French name of the film also sounds like là j’étais, which means “there I was” or “there I used to be,” the title serving as a play on words referring to time travel.

La Jetée Poster
Image source: 3×6.net/sf/category/art/

The story in La Jetée is a told by a voice-over narrator while what’s shown is a photo-montage. The overall presentation is très artistique in a style rather uniquely French that did not carry over very much to the American film it inspired. By the way, as a university student studying foreign languages (at that time, Spanish, French, and German), I took a French literature class circa 1993 in which I watched La Jetée. I liked it very much, though I falsely concluded based on the name “Marker” than the man who produced it must not have been French (he was: born Christian François Bouche-Villeneuve, who took the pen name “Marker” based on “magic markers”).

Note the apocalypse featured in La Jetée was a nuclear holocaust. The main similarity with Twelve Monkeys was the time traveling central figure in the story, who was a prisoner in his own time, whose strong memory of a woman he saw as a child helped him to make it back to the right time period. Emotionally, La Jetée is a tragic love story of a man finding a woman burned into his memory and the two of them falling in love, with him inevitably dying in the process. Though intellectually, the plot’s firmly about fate and it denies any ability of anyone to change the past. Fate is what fate is.

The Virus

The American film aimed for the exact same emotional and intellectual beats as La Jetée, even though presented in a standard movie format, with major Hollywood stars–including Bruce Willis, Madeleine Stowe, and Brad Pitt. It did offer one major change, though. In 1995, shortly after the end of the Cold War, it seemed that a nuclear apocalypse was highly unlikely (in reality it still can happen and still could have happened), so the plot featured a genetically-engineered killer virus that wipes out most of the human race, instead of a massive nuclear war.

The protagonist and his love interest. Image copyright: Universal Pictures

The film made it seem the virus would be deliberately released by a mentally unstable son (Brad Pitt) of a prominent virologist (Christopher Plummer), because of his radical environmental ideas and a disdain for humanity. The unstable son’s activist group he called “the army of the twelve monkeys,” hence the name of the movie in English. (Plot twist: the lunatic son only wanted to release monkeys held to test viruses and put his father in a cage, whereas a serious, stable, but ideologically-driven colleague of the virologist was in fact the one who deliberately released the virus.)

The protagonist meets the lunatic. Image copyright: Universal Pictures

What’s interesting at the moment of writing this post is the movie’s almost-by-accident prediction that a deadly virus could become a such a powerful threat to the survival of humanity.

Could a single virus really threaten the whole human race as portrayed in Twelve Monkeys? Probably not, because a deadly virus provokes public health responses aimed at isolating the infection, as we’re seeing happen now.

But could a powerful virus disrupt the human race and change it forever? Why, yes, at least to a degree. We’re disrupted right now. Though the changes won’t last forever and may not even have much of an effect even one year from now.

But then again, even though no human being really knows the future, it’s probably safe to predict other international viral pandemics will take place. The question is simply where and when and how large the effects will be. With the related question of how human beings will react to these threats.

Viral Fate

So is death by deadly virus part of the inevitable fate of the human race? Is this something we should fear? Would this be worse if someone did this on purpose?

David Morse as the ideologically motivated scientist who releases the virus. Image copyright: Universal Pictures.

I’ve pretty much already said, “no” to all my rhetorical questions, but clarify my position a bit, viruses have to maintain their host alive to spread. The deadlier a virus is, even if it’s very contagious as in aggressively attacking people, the deadliness of the virus works against it spreading. Because dead people don’t get around much! Meaning they don’t actively spread viruses. So outbreaks of extremely deadly viruses tend to hit a certain local area hard, but when people are dying there in mass numbers, people cut off travel to the infectious area so that the area of impact isn’t majorly international. This is how Ebola has been.

Viruses not as deadly generally spread much more easily, especially if some people carry the virus but don’t show symptoms. Which is how Covid 19 works. But of course Covid is deadly enough to require efforts to contain its spread.

Since it’s rather built into the nature of viruses that they by themselves can’t wipe out 99% of the human race, even if a human being were to jigger with them, I would say we should not be in terror of viruses, even though viruses are going to keep popping up. Though it makes sense to take reasonable precautions. Such as washing your hands. And following other guidance given out by public health officials.

Fate Fate

But wait a minute–don’t we Christians believe God knows the future? This is established in the Bible in many places, for example, Isaiah 46:10. Don’t we believe God even has determined in advance when we will die? Among other passages, reference Hebrews 9:27 for this doctrine. So why should we try to prevent our own deaths if that’s already been determined?

Could it be that like La Jetée or Twelve Monkeys we can try to change how events turn out, but in the end, what’s going to happen is what’s going to happen? So we actually have no power to change our own destiny?

Note that the TV Series Twelve Monkeys takes a different approach about changing the past via time travel, i.e. changing fate. In the series, changing fate is not impossible. It’s just very, very difficult (for an explanation, look under Development in the linked article about the series).

So which of the two 12 Monkeys views is correct? Is it possible to change our destiny, but difficult? Or is it impossible?

C.S. Lewis, so brilliant in so many things, offered an opinion of sorts on this subject in story form. In Prince Caspian he has Aslan tell Lucy when she asks what would have happened had they obeyed him better: “To know what would have happened, child?…No, nobody is ever told that.” Which would seem to imply that the choices we actually make are the only ones that really matter. As if choices we didn’t make could not have ever really happened. As if everything we do is already pre-determined.

By the way, I’m not saying Lewis believed human actions were all pre-determined. Just that the one particular bit of dialogue in Prince Caspian sounds that way. In general, Christians have rejected complete pre-determination and have maintained human will must somehow include real choices, or  much of our Christian practice would make no sense. Such as sharing the Gospel in hopes that some will believe.

Though of course some Christians have believed that God pre-determined all actions anyone could take. Though such a position is more a characteristic of people with a deterministic and cause-and-effect view of the universe acting strictly according to natural law, without direct intervention by God. Deist Albert Einstein was and atheist Sam Harris is a strong supporter of total determinism of human actions.

The Bible on What Could Have Happened

Surprisingly, Lewis seems to have goofed when he had Alan tell Lucy nobody is told what would have happened. Because the Bible records in I Samuel 23:9-13 that when David was fleeing from King Saul and occupied the town of Keilah, that the men of the city would turn him over to Saul. So David packed up and left the city–and was never turned over. So David was told what would have happened, even though it didn’t happen.

So the Bible seems to play it both ways–it declares God knows all things and has established what will happen. Yet it calls on us to pray that God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven–indicating it isn’t being done that way now.

It would seem the Bible supports the idea that changing the past would be possible, if we ever got a time machine and had the opportunity to try. Though I suspect it might be difficult.

But can we make real choices? Can we in effect change our fate? It certainly seems we can–or why else would David have been told what would have happened?


So since what you do matters, wash your hands and take some reasonable precautions versus Covid 19. 🙂

As for Twelve Monkeys, have you seen it? I’d especially be interested in hearing the thoughts of people who’ve both seen the movie and the TV series.

Are there other sci fi stories that talk about fate in the context of a viral pandemic? Or other time travel stories you’d recommend?

Travis Perry is a hard-core Bible user, history, science, and foreign language geek, hard science fiction and epic fantasy fan, publishes multiple genres of speculative fiction at Bear Publications, is an Army Reserve officer with five combat zone deployments. He also once cosplayed as dark matter.
Website ·
  1. Sounds like an interesting show. I don’t think we can ever know for sure exactly how much fate plays a part in our lives, but I believe that we either have complete free will or a blend of free will and fate. Blend in the sense that God probably planned or wants some things to occur, so maybe he’ll ensure that certain things happen, but along the way people can choose nearly every other thing they want. Or maybe if people keep denying God’s plan over and over again, he might just throw up his hands and let them do whatever.

    So, let’s say that he planned/wanted a particular guy to become a researcher that cured cancer. Any number of things could happen on the way to that, so although the smallest choices can affect outcomes, God would still be able to steer someone back to the simple goal of researcher that cures cancer. So he wouldn’t have to micromanage what flavor of ice cream the guy eats one day or what hobbies he has. But maybe the guy keeps making bad choices completely against the plan. Maybe he gets into a drug addiction and refuses to leave it, eventually dying of an overdose. That guy might have made enough bad choices to make God be like ‘Fine, do whatever you want.’

    To an extent, Steins Gate had an interesting look at fate. In some ways the concept of fate was an implied question, since the main char tries to save his best friend over and over without success at first. And then there’s the concept of world lines in that story. In one line, maybe a person ends up dying no matter what. But in another line, maybe a different person dies instead. But obviously the character’s choices still affected the way things ended up, even with the possibility of fate in their lives. If fate exists in that story world, maybe it could be seen as there being an infinite number of fates(through world lines). But only a few are going to be reachable to the chars within a particular world line, and so the chars have to choose between those few fates.

    It’s interesting to hear there’s an ancient mythical char named Cassandra, since the name sounds so modern now. When you described it, my brain started going to loopholes or ways to get around her curse. But then I realized that Apollo might notice those loopholes being used and punish Cassandra for using them. Maybe I’ll write a story with that concept some day :p

    • notleia says:

      What, you didn’t have a Greek myth phase circa middle school? But anime hadn’t percolated out to my neck of the backwoods by my middle school years. (Does this mean I’m an Old?)

      • I actually didn’t. I liked some of the story ideas and mythical creatures, and occasionally read stories based on them, but I didn’t actually research Greek myths. Back then they just weren’t my thing because I didn’t like the particular versions of them people made. But as I got older I learned more about the original versions of the myths and liked them better. There’s been a few versions of the Hades and Persephone myth I’ve really liked, for example. So far my favorite is probably Punderworld by sigeel. The comic is on Line Webtoon and Tapas and is very good so far.

    • Travis Perry says:

      Thanks for the comment.

      But the question that really drives some people crazy is if God is able to enforce His will at times, as you suggested with the cancer researcher, why doesn’t He enforce it at all times? I could say pages about this topic but the bottom line would come quite close to just saying, “I don’t know for sure how it works, but I do know God allows things to happen the Bible says He doesn’t like and the Bible also says He’s in charge of everything.”

      As I mentioned, most Christians do believe in freedom of will, but the issue is actually thorny. It’s one of those things that the more you think about it, the more complicated it seems.

      But anyway, it was only like a month ago I was reading though I Samuel again for the I-don’t-know-how-manieth-time that I realized I’d never noticed before that in contrast to what C.S. Lewis has Aslan say, David is specifically told what would happen if he made a different choice.

      Really that’s just one Biblical place that points to choices being real, but for me, I found that particular passage especially telling.

  2. I saw the 12 MONKEYS movie well over a decade ago — not in theatres, but on video after it had been around a few years. I remember thinking it was really clever, and being especially surprised and impressed by Brad Pitt’s absolutely gonzo performance, as I’d written him off as a boring Hollywood romantic lead type and didn’t know he was capable of being so weird and unglamorous.

    Anyway, interesting post!

    • Travis Perry says:

      Thank you! My own viewing of it was totally influenced by seeing La Jetee first. I think of it as a movie most sci fi fans would like, but I wonder if I would have been as interested if I’d seen it by itself.

      Yeah, this movie features a very atypical Brad Pitt!

  3. Hey Travis, 12 Monkeys is one of my all-time favorite films. It came out when I was in high school and I must have watched it a dozen (ha!) times. The ending was always so sad and satisfying and horrifying all at once. And then there’s the line, “Insurance,” that always made me laugh even though it’s terrible in its own way (or rather, the person saying it is terrible). Interestingly, I became a Christian about a year after this movie came out, and looking back I can see how God was getting my attention through end-of-the-world stories like this. Madeline Stowe’s character references the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and so that got me to read Revelation. But also there were subtle things, like how Bruce Willis sacrifices himself to save the world (or at least to try). And like you’ve pointed out, the heavy theme of fate really got me thinking. It gave me a hunger for there to be a Purpose or Design to everything.

What do you think?