1. Autumn Grayson says:

    One thing I learned with my own projects is that one reason Christian fiction elements sometimes fall short in fiction(and thus are less appealing to a wider audience) is that Christianity isn’t integrated into the story world in a way that feels natural and well developed. One thing that happens, for instance, is that authors won’t fully explore theological issues and their affect on people. They won’t allow Christianity to meet any true challenge in the series, and/or the characters will ‘know’ the full truth about it in the end, instead of letting characters truly struggle.

    Noticing this helped me fix my wolf story, actually. It isn’t perfect, but before it felt like one of the characters was just going to be randomly introduced as believing in a Creator without the concept of a Creator being discussed earlier on as an important factor in anyone’s life. So, I decided to start the story in a small atheist pack, and we get mentions of the religions of other wolf packs in some of the lessons given to the young apprentices in that pack, along with encounters with other packs. That way, religion feels like a normal influence in the world. Later on, we see clashes between wolves with different belief systems that genuinely challenge each character, regardless of their beliefs, and many of them come to the conclusions they think are best, but are still left with uncertainties.

    In a lot of ways, allowing such genuine clashes to take place is often what makes a Christian fiction story work. In depicting many of the same conflicts we have in real life, as well as having Christianity impact the story world in a believable way, it makes the story more appealing to a broader audience while also helping people understand God better.

  2. Troy Hooker says:

    Yes! I truly believe that too. I have written my first YA Christian Fiction “The Watcher Key” with these thoughts in mind. Come on, authors, let’s make an impact!

  3. John Weaver says:

    Rebecca,
    Just some comments from me, a long time lurker, who probably would not be considered Christian in most senses of the term. I think the issues you are pointing to are in some ways similar to debates that have previously occurred in Christian Contemporary Music. You have some people arguing for a more separatist approach, others a more accommodationist approach, etc. I admit that I myself sometimes get frustrated with Christian writers who essentially want to have their cake and eat it to. In other words, they make cute references to God as “The Source” or trendy Ted Dekkerish Matrix references (nothing against Dekker, who is fairly decent in my opinion), but try to distance their work as much as possible from their Christian beliefs, not out of a sincere artistic belief that this makes for better art, but because they are embarrassed of the Bible (and what it contains). I think there’s a good argument to be made against moralizing or preachiness in fiction – whether it comes from the right or the left – but I would agree that you can fully convey the Christian message without necessarily succumbing to preachiness. If one does not take the Tolkienian approach, where Christian values infuse every aspect of the secondary world, even if Christ is not mentioned, I think there is still another effective method one can use. That is to create situations in which the transmission of Christian truths feels natural or realistic given the situation the main characters are in. To me, by far the best example of this in Christian speculative fiction is Al Bohl’s Zaanan series. There are long quotes from the Bible in the series, but they never feel out of context. Bohl shows no embarrassment about the gospel, and also exemplifies Christian love by not creating secular characters that are simply cardboard cutouts. Unfortunately, until Marcher Lord Press arose, I think that kind of characterization was in short supply. For me, it is quite noticeable how poor the characterization of secular characters was in 90’s Christian fiction when compared to the quite sophisticated take that Lawhead, Bohl, Joseph Bayly, or Robert Siegel brought to the genre. In any case, to me, as a reader, I respond well to either the Tolkien-based approached, what you might classify as the “art for art’s sake”, or alternately the Bohl approach, which is forthright about the truth of the Christian message while making sure to make the conveying of that message feel a natural, organic part of the text. When the message feels added on, rather than integrated, as Autumn correctly contends, it tends to sound either moralistic or, alternately, embarssingly accomodationist to the secular world. It’s for the essentially same reason that I can comfortably listen to fundamentalists and respect their faith, but have a much harder time with neo-evangelicals, emergents, missionals, and those who believe Christianity “isn’t a religion, it’s a relationship.” Uh, no. God, if He exists, definitely needs to be treated with more reverence than that. Anyway, Rebecca, sorry for going on for so long. I hope your health is o.k. I heard you had some problems with that and wanted to send out my sympathy,

    Best,
    John Weaver

What do you think?