Managing The Minefield On The Way To Successful Publication

With the changes in the book industry, I think it’s helpful to discuss two particular elements of writing that lead to successful publication. By “successful” I mean selling to people other than our friends and family.

Baseball_player_by_Keith_AllisonMany Christian speculative fiction writers feel as if they have three strikes against them and are out of the game before they’ve even come up to bat. The thing is, we’re not alone. Christians writing mystery or suspense sometimes feel the same way. Women writers of general market speculative fiction feel this way too. For example, one author had this to say:

It’s tough, and as an ex-bookseller who once had to cram 800 Stephen King books into a tiny horror section I know space is limited, but the truth is there are TONS of brilliant women writing fantasy and we just don’t see them on display in bookshops. (Jennifer Williams, quoted in “Jen Williams responds to opinions on Bookshops’ perceived SFF Prejudice” at Fantasy Faction)

With the changes in the book industry, I think it’s helpful to discuss two particular elements of writing that lead to successful publication.

By “successful” I mean selling to people other than our friends and family. There is, of course, great success in completing a novel and in getting our friends and family to read it, let alone buy it. There’s great success in influencing one person to live life differently, and there is great success in putting words on a page with the express goal to bring God glory. So by defining “success” as I am, I am not ignoring these other ways of measuring accomplishment. Rather, I’m speaking to a particular purpose–moving books into the public arena so that readers are buying them.

Phase One involves the writing. Some writers will think this a no-brainer, but I’m speaking to my beginning-writer self, and to the many other writers out there who want to write a novel that speaks into our culture so they can change lives or influence people. These are everyday people who want to write, who have a story, who believe their story can make a difference.

Writing fiction is a craft–learn how to do it well. It takes work, starting with learning good technique. Many readers aren’t aware of this. They know story because they’ve been reading stories all their lives, so when they are inspired to tell their own story, they don’t first study how to write a novel, they simply start writing. That was me.

The fact is, there are fiction techniques that make novels better. Stories have structure, and some structure is more effective than others. Characters must be developed and worlds built and themes seamlessly and unobtrusively included. These techniques don’t come naturally. They must be learned.

RealmMakerslogoThere are many ways to learn fiction techniques. One method is to attend writers’ conferences such as Realm Makers, “the preeminent symposium for people of faith who love to create science fiction and fantasy stories.” This year’s event will be held May 30-31 at Villanova University, Villanova, PA. (Registration is now open.)

For those who don’t have the time or money to attend a conference, there are innumerable helpful writing instruction books. My favorites include Donald Maass’s Writing the Breakout Novel, Stein on Writing (Sol Stein), Description by Monica Wood, and Characters, Emotion, and Viewpoint by Nancy Kress. There are many, many others including my own ebook, Power Elements of Story Structure.

Some people may not have discretionary dollars to spend on writing instruction books. No worry. There are blogs devoted to writing instruction such as Larry Brook’s Storyfix, K. M. Weiland’s blog, agent Rachelle Gardner’s blog, and many more.

A fourth way to improve writing craft is to join a critique group, either in person or online. Getting feedback on your story can be eye-opening–not always fun or easy, but helpful, nonetheless. There are also contests such as the Spec Faith Challenges or Miss Snark’s First Victim which allow commenters to give a writer feedback.

Finally there are freelance editors who can give you a variety of services, from a paid critique to a full content and copy edit. Of course, some conferences also offer critiques, either for a moderate fee or as part of the conference tuition.

Besides learning and applying good fiction techniques, there’s a second phase to successful publication–promotion and marketing. I’ve seen some not-great fiction sell well because the author has some expertise in this second phase. On the other hand, I’ve seen some quality fiction get lost from the public’s view because the author did little promotion.

Before promotion, there are some key marketing-type things a writer who plans to self-publish should consider such as cover and interior design. For more information on self-publishing, you may wish to read “The Behind-the-Scenes Ingredients for Being a Bestselling Successful Self-Published Author” by Stacey Aaronson.

One of the best ways to promote a book is to speak. This strategy is especially effective for writers of middle grade or young adult books because they can arrange speaking events in schools, allowing them to talk directly to their audience. Some writers are natural speakers while others turn themselves into speakers by studying and practicing through an organization like Toastmasters.

Of course, most industry professionals say that the number one way to promote a book is through “buzz,” or talk about the book generated by readers. Social media offers a number of ways to generate buzz, but unfortunately, too much comes across like spam. Of course, no one has the magic formula, the sure-fired, can’t-miss way of getting attention.

Writing something controversial does often draw attention to a book. See, for example, The Shack. While Paul Young has written other books since that first blockbuster, none has received the public notice that it received. They simply haven’t generated the same level of controversy. Others that may owe their initial success to controversy surrounding the book are Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Fifty Shades of Gray, and The Da Vinci Code.

CSAbutton 2013Of course, books don’t have to sell at the blockbuster level to be successful. In fact, few ever reach that rank. Still, they might receive more attention because they reach the finals in a contest like the Clive Staples Award or they are featured in a blog tour by a group like the Christian Science Fiction and Fantasy (CSFF) Blog Tour.

More recently collections of writers working together to support and promote each other’s work, such as New Authors Fellowship, has gained traction. Groups like Christian Indie Novelists, a Yahoo! group, offer support, services, and encouragement. The new collective, Ruby Slippers Media, led by Merrie Destefano, is a move toward this kind of author-helping-author promotion.

Of course, Spec Faith is a bit of a conglomeration–supporting writers, holding or sponsoring contests, promoting books. The truth is, a site like Spec Faith needs participation–reviewers offering their reviews, commenters interacting with the daily subject matter, readers voting for contest entries. We do what we do primarily because we want to see more Christian speculative novels become successful, and we count on our visitors to help us.

We’d like to hear from you. What do you think is the most important thing to make a book successful?

Let The Reading Begin

Remember, to be eligible to vote for the finalists you MUST have read AT LEAST two of the nominations.
on Mar 1, 2014 · 3 comments

Voting beginsNow that the 2014 CSA nominations are closed, we have several weeks to read books on the list.

Remember, to be eligible to vote for the finalists you MUST have read AT LEAST two of the nominations.

Voting begins March 17.

The CSA team still needs to do some verification to be sure that all the books which have been nominated meet the CSA eligibility qualifications, but the list we have at this point is as follows (alphabetized by the author’s first name):

Dragonwitch, Anne Elisabeth Stengl, Bethany
The Circle Girls, Anya Novikov, Watershed Books
Exodus Rising, Bryan Davis, Zondervan
Constant Tower, Carole McDonnell, Wildside Press
Storm, Evan Angler, Thomas Nelson
Secrets Kept, J. L. Mbewe, AltWit Press
Rage’s Echo, J.S. Bailey, Tate Publishing
Memory’s Door, James L. Rubart, Thomas Nelson
Heroes of the Horde 1: Unleashed, Jennifer Hartz, Desert Breeze Publishing
Future Savior Book 1: Revelation, Jennifer Hartz, Desert Breeze Publishing
Shadow Chaser, Jerel Law, Thomas Nelson
Truth Runner, Jerel Law, Thomas Nelson
Captives, Jill Williamson, Blink
Failstate: Legend, John Otte, Marcher Lord Press
Never to Live, Just B. Jones, Marcher Lord Press
Amish Vampires in Space, Kerry Nietz, Marcher Lord Press
Anomoly, Krista McGee, Thomas Nelson
Luminary, Krista McGee, Thomas Nelson
The Darker Road, L.B. Graham, AMG Publishers / Living Ink Books
Nightriders, Marc Schooley, Marcher Lord Press
Son of Truth, Morgan Busse, Marcher Lord Press
A Cast of Stones, Patrick Carr, Bethany House
The Hero’s Lot, Patrick W. Carr, Bethany House
King, R. J. Larson, Bethany House
Merlin’s Blade, Robert Treskillard, Blink
Merlin’s Shadow, Robert Treskillard, Blink
A Hero’s Throne, Ross Lawhead, Thomas Nelson
The Remedy, Serena Chase, Candent Gate
The Ryn, Serena Chase, Candent Gate
Broken Wings, Shannon Dittemore, Thomas Nelson
Dark Halo, Shannon Dittemore, Thomas Nelson
The Shadow Lamp, Stephen Lawhead, Thomas Nelson
Sandstorm, Steve Rzasa, Marcher Lord
The Sinners’ Garden, William Sirls, Thomas Nelson

My Writing Influences

Keven, you write dark paranormal Christian fiction. How in the world did you get there?? Glad you asked.
on Feb 28, 2014 · 8 comments

wintercoverI’ve never talked much about the writers that have most influenced me. I think in some interview or other I’ve listed one or two, but I’ve never really told my writing journey by way of my reading journey. As the saying goes, “You are what you eat,” and so you also “write what you read.”

I don’t think I’ve keep it a secret that my first love is the fantasy genre. That may come as a surprise to some that know me as a paranormal suspense writer, but you’d be interested to know that prior to Winter and Prophetess almost everything I wrote was fantasy slanted and most of my to-write list is populated with fantasy ideas.

trapped-in-death-cave-bill-wallace-paperback-cover-artMy first attempt to write was fantasy fan-fic based on a video game I loved, complete with King James English, because that’s how they talked in the game. But what I’ve never told is that prior to this 5th grade attempt to write a story, I was a voracious reader of middle grade thrillers, mostly written by Bill Wallace and Robert Arthur. So, list them as influencers #1 & #2.

Trapped in Death Cave and Danger on Panther Peak (Wallace) were two of my all-time favorites. So much so that I sought copies as an adult to make sure my son had a chance to read these awesome books. And The Three Investigators: The Secret of Terror Castle (Arthur) gave me a taste of a real mystery/thriller.

But there was something that just didn’t click with me. I’m not sure what it was. These stories were fun and all, but they didn’t quite inspire me to make my own.

Yet that video game did. The original Dragon Warrior for NES. Now THAT was something I could get excited about. But were there books this exciting? I tried a few I thought would match, only to be sorely disappointed. I’m still not sure why Tolkien and Lewis didn’t show up at this time. But Robin McKinley did. Influencer #3, and probably one of the most influential on my list. So let’s put her as 3-Plus.

Wow. The Hero and the Crown by Robin McKinley revolutionized the way I thought of fiction. To this day it remains at the top of my all-time favorite-books list, and McKinley remains one of my all-time favorite authors. I never miss a chance to read her newest material, and at least once every two or three years I make the time to re-read The Hero and the Crown. Read it again just this past fall, btw. I’m still trying to figure out how she managed to build an entire fantasy world, weave a three-part epic, and wrap everything up nicely in the space of a single stand-alone novel less that 150k in length. Newberry winner, btw.

Now the years fast forward. I begin in small ways to make my own stories. At some point Tolkien and Lewis came into my life and influenced my writing in small ways, but nothing compared to the foundation that had already been laid by the three authors I’ve already mentioned. And if it was fantasy…I read it.

But Keven, you write dark paranormal Christian fiction. How in the world did you get there?? Glad you asked, because there are still two major influences to come.

Raven_(7157198504)In high school, my writing kicked into high gear. I read some Stephen King (horror), William Gibson (cyberpunk), and the like, as well as the required classics for class, but what really made an impression on me was the honorable Edgar Allen Poe, influencer #4. That’s right, the classic master of suspense and horror showed me that true horror came from within and that true suspense knew how to wait. Most of my writing during that time took a very Poe-ish turn. In fact, some of my poetry and short-stories were so dark and disturbing that in today’s schools I would have probably been suspended and sent to counseling. The stories weren’t gory or bloody. . .well, most of them. Just Poe-ishly horrible and terrifying.

By my senior year I was well underway with my first novel, a dark-fantasy epic full of anachronistic dialogue and teen angst. I never finished. But just the fact that I had started something so ambitious was an important step. I still have the original writings and the basic outlines, and I plan one day to go back to them. It’s a good story.

But something else was now bothering me. My faith began to cry out that all of this terror I was pouring in and this fantasy setting I was building couldn’t possibly be Christian-like. So all through college I basically stopped writing while I wrestled with how in the world I could write what I was inspired to write and still glorify God.

Enter influencer #5, the last of my major influencers: Frank Peretti. Like many Christian writers today, I owe the ability to write what I do to the fact that Peretti blazed a trail few knew existed and even fewer were willing to follow. Suddenly Christian and thriller made sense. Christian and terror made sense. Christian and fantasy made sense. It could be done. And I began to see ways to manipulate story-lines and build allegories that told a larger story to demonstrate my faith.

So, within a month of graduating from college I began my first novel, Among Dragons. I finished it, still not knowing exactly what I was doing. But I had become a writer. This fantasy novel was never published, but I’ve been slowly rewriting it to get it ready. Digital Dragon Magazine even ran a few of the first chapters a couple years ago.

Winter came shortly after Among Dragons. And if you look deeply into my influences you should be able to see quite clearly how this fantasy lover produced a paranormal suspense loved by so many fans.

So to recap, my major influences are Bill Wallace (MG thriller), Robert Author (YA mystery), Robin McKinley (fantasy), Edgar Allen Poe (horror), and Frank Peretti (paranormal thriller).

You really do write what you read.

– – – – –
Keven NewsomeKeven Newsome is a child of God, husband, father, and friend, in that order. He’s also a novelist, musician, and sometimes artist. He has an MA in Theology, specializing in supernatural theology, from the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. His debut novel Winter was a finalist for the Compton Crook Awards and the Grace Awards. His other works include Prophetess, the sequel to Winter; three contributing stories in the Aquasynthesis anthology; and a contributing micro-story in the Avenir Eclectia anthology. Keven is the founder of The New Authors’ Fellowship and produces music and video through Newsome Creative.

Connect with Keven online:

www.KevenNewsome.com
www.facebook.com/kevennewsome
www.twitter.com/kevennewsome
www.youtube.com/kevennewsome

Being Blessed By All The Fiction Crazy

Despite Christians’ fiction craziness, our crazy-generous God keeps giving to the undeserving.
on Feb 27, 2014 · 4 comments

None of us deserve great stories, mainly because we’re sinners. Yet God gives them.

In last week’s column, I expressed latent frustration with “all the fiction crazy.” My worst-day criticisms remain. I define “fiction crazy” not as any kind of honest fiction fandom — which would be better — but instead as ignoring great stories, or pushing subpar stories and calling them great, or justifying poor or even un-Biblical stories as “evangelism tools.”1 Some of God’s people honestly call fiction frivolous, or worse, suggest that it’s equivalent to lying.

But that doesn’t discount the gift. Even the craziest of us can be God’s own people, so long as we repent to, believe in, and reflect the true Jesus. Even when we fail, God is crazy generous, blessing us with far more than bonus benefits.

“He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?” (Rom. 8:32)

God gives every good gift (James 1:17) only to the undeserving. Like with rain or sun (Matt. 5:45), He gives stories and imagination to His people and the unrighteous alike. Stories and imagination reflect His character, with this chief difference: God is the Master Storyteller, solely privileged to make His imaginations become reality.

Stories’ threefold blessings

I can’t speak for you, but I can speak for how God uses great stories to bless me. And to describe how, I’ll borrow a format from systematic theology books. Many of those roughly structure their explorations of God’s Word according to (1) God, (2) man, (3) the world.

1. Stories help us worship the true God.

At least “Their empire. His Kingdom” is an excellent and very Biblical tagline.

At least “Their empire. His Kingdom” is an excellent and very Biblical tagline.

This is a blessing on which I often focus to the exclusion of the other two. Somehow I find it groundbreaking: If all of life is worship (of which local-church worship remains set apart and special), then reading stories is worship. And in experiencing stories, so long as we do this without personal sin, we are glorifying God as if we were singing or hearing a sermon.

Suddenly it seems more Christians are uncertain about images of Jesus Christ in a film like Son of God, based on the (in)famous The Bible History Channel miniseries. They feel these images violate the Second Commandment in Exodus 20: 4–5. Some make good points — though I’m unsure how an image of Jesus Christ, Himself the visible Image of invisible God (Col. 1:15), relates to the command not to make an image of God specifically to worship.

Perhaps the image-critics’ best argument would be to say that no human image “of Jesus” could come close to representing even the human image of Jesus. I would agree with that, if we are talking about “seeing” Jesus in a movie. Those have never quite helped me worship the real Jesus Christ better, any more than they’ve tempted me to worship the image.

But what about “images of” Jesus Christ in fiction — a human hero, a majestic not-tame Lion, even a miracle/magic-working wizard? Again, I can’t speak for you, but for my part these figures only make me want to know and praise the real Jesus Christ. That’s worship.

2. Stories help us relate to other people.

This is also why we should worship with stories together in Biblical churches.

This is also why we should worship with stories together in Biblical churches.

Fandoms. Real community. Shared love of God’s Story and shared love of other stories, especially fantastic stories. All of that makes for great friendships and relationships in the wide, wonderful, crazy family/Kingdom of God. Even if I was fuzzier on the worship-of-God concept, this would be enough blessing: if stories help pull people together around the ultimate Hero, across the distances and denominations and minor doctrinal differences.

3. Stories help us shine light in the world.

Whether your favorite story is made by a Christian or non-Christian, this much they have in common: at best they only rearrange or invert parts of God’s Story. Even our “Christ-figure” heroes can only be “Christ-figure-figure” heroes, reflecting us when we best reflect the real Christ. Our heroes are copies of copies, the copies are us, and we should copy Christ.

diamond_overdarknessThis gives the Christian a huge — though one would hope humbly used — advantage.

We can both use stories to shine light into the world, and find pockets of light already there.

Example: a fan of Supernatural may be bent toward mystical pursuits for their own ends. Yet he/she is also vulnerable to a premise of that show’s title: that there’s more to life than what we see. From where did that idea come from? The real world. And the real world is a “God-ward” world. It’s not yet “Christian,” but the real world shows God enough so that He can rightly condemn people who rejected that revelation; they’ll have no excuse (Rom. 1).

This also makes me wonder if God will count good stories in the world as further evidence if we reject Him. Could He rightly say, “You loved that story about that good hero and never even tried to find the Source”? Could He justifiably count our own fandoms against us?

If I ended on that low note, it would be two weeks too many. For God’s people, stories show us darkness and light — and not only in black and white, but a glorious spectrum of color. God did not need to give us things like color, amazing animals, and stories. But He did.

Are You Your Body?

“You are not your body” is a sentiment that gets tossed around a lot in Christian circles, this idea that we are merely temporarily enfleshed souls.
on Feb 26, 2014 · 13 comments

I want to take a moment to rewrite the creation story, if you don’t mind. I know, I know, heresy, right? Except I think that I can make it more in-tune with the way most Christians see things.

To wit:

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And upon creating the world, He planted a garden in the east of Eden. There were four rivers that flowed out of it, but they’re not important right now, so I won’t bother in trying to name them or even try to maintain the pious voice I’ve been cultivating.

At any rate, upon planting this garden, He placed within it two ethereal souls, bodiless spirits in the fashion of the angels themselves. One He called Adam, the other was eventually called Eve. And how Adam and Eve loved to frolic through the Garden, doing whatever it is that disembodied souls would do in a physical world.

Adam and EveBut then, one day, the Serpent appeared, the craftiest of all God’s creatures. And the Serpent approached Eve and tricked her into sinning by somehow eating the forbidden fruit (an interesting feat, given a bodiless spirit’s lack of a mouth or digestive system). Eve, in turn, got Adam to eat the fruit as well.

And that’s when everything went off the rails. God showed up in the Garden and started handing out curses and condemnations for the introduction of sin into the world. When the dust settled, Adam and Eve discovered that they had been changed. They had been given physical bodies, a fleshly prison that would tempt them and corrupt them until the day that they would be set free from it by death, able to once again return to their purely spiritual state, the way that they were always intended to be.

The End.

So what do you think? How many of you are writing up writs of excommunication or trying to figure out how to contact my ecclesiastical superiors for daring to rewrite Holy Scripture?

Don’t bother. And don’t worry. I haven’t gone heretical. Rather, this week, something’s gotten stuck in my theological craw, namely a hint of gnosticism. More specifically, I took a little bit of issue with the latest video from Blimey Cow, namely this one:

So what’s wrong with this? It seems like a fairly innocuous “Don’t be so hard on yourself” type of message that people need to hear, right?

Well, sure, but I have a real problem with #1, the whole “You are not your body” schtick.

It’s a sentiment that gets tossed around a lot in Christian circles, this idea that we are merely temporarily enfleshed souls. A lot of people like to add in this quote, which supposedly comes from C. S. Lewis:

youareasoulyouhaveabody

Click on the picture for a great article about whether or not C.S. Lewis said this.

If we’re just souls, why did God give us bodies when He created us? If we’re just souls that have bodies, why will we be reunited with our bodies at the resurrection? If we’re just souls that have bodies, why does the Bible speak of death as the enemy that has to be defeated and put down? Simply put, this notion that we are merely souls temporarily inhabiting bodies isn’t Biblical. If anything, it’s the ancient heresy of gnosticism being given new life in our teachings. If you want more information on gnosticism, here’s a quick primer. Pay close attention to the “dualistic” nature of this belief, that physical matter is inherently corrupt and evil and thus, something to be escaped.

Now, I know, the folks at Blimey Cow were trying to make a point, and a good one. Body image issues are rampant in our culture today and we have to remind people that they shouldn’t put too much pressure on themselves if their bodies aren’t Photoshopped perfect. I know this quite well. I’m 6′ 6″, and I used to be mocked mercilessly because I was head-and-shoulders taller than the rest of my classmates. As a result, I’ve had some self-esteem issues that have haunted me my whole life. The message that they’re trying to convey is important.

But I think it’s also equally important to remember: God created us to be human beings, body and soul united together in perfection. Sin has unmade that perfection. Death seeks to destroy the unity. Only God, through Christ, can forgive the sin and defeat death so that one day, our bodies and souls will be perfect for all eternity. And that’s a message worth cherishing.

Fantastic or Not?

Does a change in skin color represent the original character or create a continuity problem? Michael B. Jordan may find out in playing the Human Torch.
on Feb 25, 2014 · 38 comments

Ultimate Human TorchNews broke last week about the casting in a new Fantastic Four movie scheduled to open on March 6th, 2015. The “surprise” is that director Josh Trank has cast black actor Michael B. Jordan to play the Human Torch. I say surprise in quotes because the rumors had been circulating for months as noted at ScreenRant.com.

This decision has apparently been hotly criticized by fans of the comics, though I didn’t run across said criticism in my research. All the sites I looked at were for it, mostly considering it a necessary adjustment to 50’s racist values, the need to modernize the franchise, or just smart business sense to give the black community a reason to see the film.

I’ve always had a problem when movies or other media change the character as created.

Certainly characters evolve, but I’ve yet to see a caucasian turn black, or a black person become white.

Last year, in responding to the idea of him playing the Human Torch, Michael B. Jordan said:

“Things change and time goes on, it’s 2013 right now,” Jordan says of the Torch talk. “The characteristics of the Human Torch are his name is Johnny Storm, he’s charismatic, and he’s a playboy. That’s it. You know what I’m saying? That’s all there is.”

I respectfully disagree, especially as a writer. You change skin color, hair color, eye color, personality, etc., you no longer have the original character. You have a new character. For me it is a matter of continuity. If there is going to be a change, it needs to be explained in a rational way how that white dude suddenly became black.

Ironically, the article about this subject at Comics Alliance, while praising the decision to cast Michael as the Torch as a strike for racial equality, goes on to say about the decision to cast Jaimie Bell, that “English guy,” as The Thing:

What does Bell actually bring to the role? Does he embody hangdog word-weariness? Can he offer an immaculate Lower East Side accent?

So, let me get this straight. Skin color–not a reason to match with the original character. But an English accent is bad casting for what is supposed to be an East Side one? Only goes to point out how important continuity is for a character, including skin color, sex, and accent, among others.

The fact is that the four have always been white, even through the Marvel Ultimate modernization and the recent films from 2005. Then with no explanation, he turns black.

Note: I would love to see more black superheroes hit the big screen. Also Latinos are absent, as are Asians. They missed their chance to put one of each in this new film. My beef has nothing to do with racism, believing it will ruin the movie, believing that Mr. Jordan isn’t a good actor who could otherwise play that role with skill. It is due to the reality that changing the characteristics of a character makes it a new character.

But I have a suggestion on how Hollywood should go about this. Create new superheroes that are black. Both Marvel and Hollywood should take that advice. If you do change up the original character, you’d better provide a good reason why, or you end up with not a black Human Torch, but a new black superhero with similar powers replacing the Human Torch.

It would help if Hollywood didn’t fixate on rebooting the same stories over and over again.

I’m guessing we’re in for another serving of “our version” of the origin story. Oh boy. I can hardly wait.

What do you think? Good casting call or do you have a problem with it?

There Be Dragons

In Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis describes those moments in which some earthly experience awakens us to the truth that there is more to the world than our earthly experience.
on Feb 24, 2014 · 6 comments

JRogers[Note from RLM: I’m turning my normal writing slot over to author Jonathan Rogers. He grew up in Georgia, where he spent many happy hours in the swamps and riverbottoms. He received his undergraduate degree from Furman University in South Carolina and holds a Ph.D. in seventeenth-century English literature from Vanderbilt University (but don’t let that intimidate you–you’re in for a treat). Jonathan lives with his wife and six children in Nashville, Tennessee.]

– – – – –

Once when eighteen or nineteen years old, my father and I were puttering up a familiar stretch of Georgia’s Ocmulgee River in a small aluminum boat. As we passed a sandbar that I had seen a hundred times, I was startled to see a part of the sandbar move. Only it wasn’t the sandbar that moved; it was a great, thick alligator, ten feet long at least, with a tail as big around as a saw log. I had been coming to the Ocmulgee River all my life, but I had never seen an alligator in its waters or on its banks. But there he was, as big as life and twice as natural.

It’s hard to articulate what I felt when I realized what I was seeing. The alligator was terrible to behold. But he was thrilling to behold too. If he had wanted to, he could have swept our little boat into the river and eaten us up. I know that alligators don’t ever behave that way (indeed, I knew it even then), but it wasn’t that reasoning part of my brain that first reacted to the sight of this monster. Was it the so-called “lizard brain”—the seat of the fight-or-flight reflex—that kicked in? Probably so. But it wasn’t just the lizard brain that came alive in that moment. It was also the part of the brain (or, more appropriately, the soul) that responds to mythology—to old stories of dragons and monsters and elves and dwarves that lurk at the edges of the worlds that we humans try to keep civilized and comfortable.

surprised-by-joy-coverIn Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis describes those moments in which some earthly experience awakens us to the truth that there is more to the world than our earthly experience. In Lewis’s case, a little model garden his brother had made in a biscuit tin, Arthur Rackham’s illustrations of the Ring Cycle, a flowering currant bush—all seemingly inconsequential things—gave him “the stab, the pang, the inconsolable longing” for a world beyond this world.

For me, the sight of that alligator was just such a stab of what Lewis called Joy. I had seen alligators before. I had been to the zoo. I had been to the Okefenokee Swamp. But this alligator lived only ten miles away from my house. He was in “my” river, where I had been coming all my life. A week earlier, I had swum across its muddy waters, not a mile from the very sandbar where this great dragon lay like Smaug on his pile of treasure.

I lived in a world where the roads were paved and hot water came out of the faucet. We had a television, a VCR, a microwave oven. There were McDonald’s restaurants in my world and Top 40 radio stations and convenience stores that sold Coca-Cola and potato chips.

But there were also dragons.

My friends think it’s funny that every novel and short story I have ever written involves at least one alligator. I suppose it is kind of funny. But alligators for me carry a lot of metaphorical freight. They remind us that this world, the one where we live and move and have our being, is still a place of myth and marvel. This world, too, is a fantasy world.

– – – – –

All 3 Wilderking BookcoersJonathan Rogers, author of The Charlatan’s Boy and the Wilderking Trilogy, is happy to announce that the Rabbit Room Press (home of Andrew Peterson’s last two Wingfeather Saga books) is republishing The Bark of the Bog Owl, The Secret of the Swamp King, and The Way of the Wilderking.

These paperbacks may be pre-ordered, insuring delivery in March, well-ahead of the official April 1 release date. In addition, pre-ordered books will help defray the publishing costs, which will insure a larger printing.

These books, excellent read-aloud stories perfect for middle graders, particularly middle grade boys,  have been out of print for the last three years, so bringing them back for a new group of readers is a brilliant move by RRP. It’s also a fitting way to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the original publication of the first in the series.

Christian Fantasy: A Life-Saving Genre

In my opinion, Christian fantasy embodies fantastical elements in an internally consistent setting all the while reflecting aspects of the Christian world view.
on Feb 21, 2014 · 12 comments

13-The-Lion-The-Witch-and-the-Wardrobe-201x300Definitions of literary genres can be . . . well, complex. Even tricky. Attempts to define Christian fantasy vary, though I’ve spent little time fretting over an official definition. I mean, Christian fiction typically illustrates a Christian world view within its plot, characters, or both. And the fantasy genre commonly uses myths and legends as a primary plot element, theme, or setting. So, in my opinion, Christian fantasy embodies fantastical elements in an internally consistent setting all the while reflecting aspects of the Christian world view.

But the debate (at least for some) surrounds who writes Christian fantasy. Writers who are Christians, writers who claim to be Christians, or writers who believe Christianity is a fantasy to begin with? It’s not a debate I choose to enter, for the truth lies outside the discussion: the genre influences nonbelievers. My path to salvation began with a classic fantasy, told to me in the midst of my secular world.

When I was in the fifth grade, my teacher read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis aloud to my class. In doing so, she opened my eyes to adventure and possibilities, all the while helping me escape a world of darkness for a short time. At its conclusion, I wondered, Is God real? He couldn’t be, right? For if He existed, innocent young girls wouldn’t suffer the wrath of drunken addicts, or the torment of abandonment.

I continued to speculate. Each time God placed believers in my path–a high school teacher, a college friend, and a college coach–my fascination with the possibility grew stronger until the truth stunned me like a slap to the face. God indeed lives in the form of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. He rescues. He saves. And He waited for me. Then He embraced me. It all started with a little seed, planted in the empty heart of the girl I once was. A love for reading expanded to a love for writing. A desire to know God became a desire to serve Him, to reach nonbelievers.

Never Let Go - Front CoverAnd Never Let Go was born.

In all things, I’m grateful to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ for embracing a lost, lonely girl. That He died for me…there is no greater gift. My prayer is that I’ll never let go of His truth.

Back Cover Blurb:

Captured by the Rendow Clan, who seek to slaughter those with faith in the Maker, Laila Pennedy awaits death. Moments before her execution, she is rescued from the gallows by Lars Landre and his dragon. Marked as The Chosen by his blue eyes, Lars is destined to lead the Faithful out of persecution.

Lars guides Laila on a harrowing race across The Woodlands to Tuveil, where the Faithful are preparing to fight a rebellion. But the secret location of the village is betrayed and the Rendow Clan’s army will soon be at the gates. Faced with this impeding peril, Laila trains for battle, but the struggles in her mind and heart may be as overwhelming as the war to come. Will she prove herself an asset or is she condemned to forever be a burden to those she loves?

[Editorial note: Never Let Go releases June 3, 2014, but is available for pre-order now.] Pre-order Never Let Go here.

– – – – –

Angie Brashear - HeadshotAuthor Bio:

When Angie Brashear isn’t working or taking care of her family, she writes. Usually at night after her kids fall asleep. She’s an avid reader and runner, both of which perplex her husband. Saved in her early twenties, Angie is grateful for the Lord’s presence in all aspects of her life. She is originally from Rockland, Maine, and currently resides in Cameron, Texas, with her husband and three children. Follow her at http://facebook.com/AngieBrashearAuthor, https://twitter.com/AngieBrashear, and http://angiebrashear.com.

Getting A Little Tired Of All The Fiction Crazy

Sometimes I wonder why we advocate better stories for Christians who do not “deserve” them.
on Feb 20, 2014 · 22 comments
A little levity: the author's graphic illustration (from 2009) of the uber-flexible Dr. Al Mohler as Reed "Mr. Fantastic" Richards.

A little levity: the author’s graphic illustration (from 2009) of the uber-flexible Dr. Albert Mohler as Reed “Mr. Fantastic” Richards.

Today I un-ask all my questions about Dr. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and responder to a question I asked him last Monday.

This was my question: Though you encourage Christians to read deep books, you never seem to recommend fiction on your website; how come?1 His response was well-reasoned, personal, and sensible.

Yet sometimes I might think he didn’t go far enough.

Frankly, some Christians don’t deserve awesome stories.

And in difficult times I also wonder why we even bother pushing for more of them. I’ll just come right out and admit it, even grump a little: Earn2 great stories, then we’ll talk.

Dr. Mohler’s remarks didn’t endorse this conclusion of mine. Here’s how it went Monday night, Feb. 10, at the small lecture and Q-and-A session at the University of Texas at Austin.

Actually my sister-in-law, Lyric, nearly stole my question; hers ended up being a perfect lead-in. Based on Mohler’s refrain that good Christians engage culture and read, she asked what Mohler thought of stories such as the Harry Potter series or the Hunger Games series.

I didn’t have a digital recorder handy. But in short, Mohler said that he is often asked about such popular-culture issues in person and during interviews. Parents want him to speak against these stories. But he can’t, he said; after all he has given similar novels to his own children. And, Mohler added, Christians must not condemn what we haven’t read.3

Next came my question about why Mohler doesn’t recommend fiction. He replied like this:

I read a lot of fiction and enjoy fiction. But I find it very difficult to recommend fiction, so I tend to avoid that. I suppose I believe that one’s response to fiction, positive or negative, is far more personal than one’s response to nonfiction. If I were to recommend a particular novel, for example, and say it was wonderful, someone could immediately question why I didn’t see this or that element wrong or un-Godly about the novel. So I lean toward nonfiction.

Sometimes I find myself taking his reasons to what seems an even more-logical conclusion.

  • You know, this whole exploring-epic-stories thing is more trouble than it’s worth.
  • Christians will make up their own reasons to hate, treat lightly, naĂŻvely praise or else ignore great stories; what’s the point of spending hours of nonprofit time on the topic?
  • Are most folks in this movement to explore God’s glories by exploring epic stories together, or mainly to promote their own stories and build autonomous careers?
  • God spreads His eternal Kingdom through preaching and churchy things and other specific ministries, so really, isn’t all this simply trivial? Sure, God inspired creative, beautiful, and even artistically “dangerous” Psalms, and Jesus spent three years telling and re-telling parables that outpaced all other oral traditions from his era — but what are creative reflections of that kind of art compared to preaching sermons and overt Gospel work and giving to the poor and Saving the Nation from religious technocrats?
  • We can have all the great stories published, reviews written, talking points about the truths and beauties of great stories distributed — and yet someone for whatever silly or supposed “sola Scriptura” reason is going to hate the story you love, and claim you are either lying to them about your motives or even going to Hell — so the point, again?

That last returns me to Mohler’s comment. I can’t imagine what it must be like to have that kind of ministry “platform.” Suddenly you’re an Evangelical Bigwig. People want you to kiss their babies and bless their pets and write forewords to your latest greatest life-changing book. And no matter how much you speak about the value of personal-level education and discernment — to Mohler’s credit — people will try to outsource their discernment to you. And if you say something they don’t like — to my debit — people will grump at you for not taking up their pet cause or promoting your amazing ministry work or not also speaking out against Historic Abuse X that this group/person/affiliate once actually did.

So no wonder Mohler avoids the fiction issue. If he compliments Harry Potter even once or says he found value in The Hunger Games, it’s clobbering time. Christians can’t handle the disagreement. Better to keep your head down, avoid specifics, and do your best to build better and more-thoughtful readers who read anything for personal joy and love for neighbors. In fact, this is exactly what Mohler and others are doing.

Lately I wonder if I should also do this: simply help Christians earn the right to great stories. Then I can come back to the speculative fiction thing in about, oh, 50 years.

Yet I love stories. And I love the friends these stories help give me.

Still, it’s better to concede struggles like this. Let us not contribute to the notion that some of us are Super-Evangelicals who can’t be pained by weariness or just plain irritation with all those people who don’t “deserve” it. God Himself did not treat His people the same way. We didn’t deserve His greatest Story.

And for all its flaws, I hope He will bless the Christian-spec-stories “cause” anyway.

  1. For example, see Mohler’s Missing Genre? about the SBTS president’s 2013 summer reading list.
  2. Notice I didn’t say “write.”
  3. With the exception that some novels — though very few — qualify as plain porn, Mohler added.

Redefining Creationism

The focus on evolution vs. creation distracts from what Genesis 1 actually teaches.
on Feb 18, 2014 · 60 comments

Creation_windowOn February 4, 2014, the much hyped debate occurred between Bill Nye, supporting evolution, and Ken Ham, supporting creationism. The debate centered around which origin theories were acceptable science. You can watch the whole thing on YouTube if you desire.

Disclaimer: I did not watch the debate. In part because it is long and I haven’t had the time, but also because I believe it is a non-issue. So why am I writing an article on it?

The focus on evolution vs. creation distracts from what Genesis 1 actually teaches.

The approach to creation that Ken Ham promotes overlooks the obvious. It takes Genesis to be a modern, Western historical narrative. It is not. But Ken suggests if you don’t believe in his interpretation of the text, you do not believe in the Biblical creation nor the Bible.

Likewise, the theory of evolution remains just that: a theory. One that can find supporting evidence with inner-species evolution, but not much showing inter-species. Due to the fact that so little of animal life on this planet gets fossilized, it would be impossible to prove the theory from the fossil record. There are too many gaps, making faith-based leaps of logic a necessity. Theories within a theory.

I think most of us have heard all the arguments. I personally chose to accept what it says without the need to defend it. The reality is that it says God created the world and us. Whether He chose to do it in six literal days or 36 million years is irrelevant. Genesis 1 can be interpreted validly either way. If I arrive in Heaven to discover that God took millions of years to create the world and used evolution to create us, it won’t shake my faith in the least.

Creationism is about who and why this world and universe exists, not about how.

One of the first things I learned in Biblical exegesis is to determine the type of literature I’m interpreting. To interpret Jesus’ allegory of the Vine and Branches in John 15 literally would be to miss the point of Jesus’ message. Likewise, an analogy or type used in Scripture can be both literally and symbolically true.

What many people miss is that Genesis 1 is constructed as Hebraic poetry. Does this mean it is all symbolic? Not necessarily. However, it does mean how you read it and the message you get should be informed by that type of literature.

Why is it poetry? Because Hebraic poetry is structured on a rhyme of thought instead of words. It uses parallelism and contrasts to make its points. This is typical of Psalms and Proverbs.

O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart. (Pro 8:5 KJV – parallelism)

He that covereth a transgression seeketh love; but he that repeateth a matter separateth very friends. (Pro 17:9 KJV – contrast)

Likewise, the more the same thing is said in different ways, the stronger the emphasis.

He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name’s sake. (Psa 23:2-3 KJV – 4 parallel statements on God’s comfort in times of sorrow)

If you ignore the concerns about evolution or six literal 24-hour days, what you discover is that the period of time labeled as “a day” is being used to create a parallel structure. When viewed this way, the scientific sequence actually makes more sense.

Days one through three detail the creation of environments. Days four through six parallel those days with the creation of the entities within those environments.

Day one, for example, talks about the creation of light. Day four, about the sun and stars. On day three and six, you get a two-parter for each day. Day three shows the creation of land while day six fills that land with animals. But the second half of day three, God creates the plants, where as in day six, He creates man.

In both cases, the second half of the days creates links to and within creation. The plants link the inanimate life to the animate, while man links animal life and the world to God. This dynamic is highlighted in a triple parallel statement for emphasis:

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Gen 1:27 KJV)

The message? We’re all linked to this world, and designed to be linked to God, through man who was created in His image (having a capacity for divine life to live in him) and His likeness (the divine life living in him).

This message sets up not only the context of the Fall, but our redemption.

For God rested on the seventh day, to which there is not given a parallel structure. It isn’t until Jesus Christ dies and rests in the tomb on the seventh day of the week—the Sabbath—that the eighth day of creation occurred when He rose from the dead.

This is why you’ll find most early church baptistries were eight-sided. Dying with Christ and being raised to new life in Christ was to enter into the eighth day of creation.

That’s the message of Genesis 1. I have no problem believing that God created the world in six literal days. He’s certainly more than capable. Most pre-Darwin interpretations default to speaking of them as days without any qualifications. Likewise, if those days represent an undefined time period and are used more as poetic divisions than actual days, as the Hebrew would allow, I’m fine with God creating the world and us in that way.

But how God created the world and us, and in what order He did is not the point of Genesis 1. The more we focus on a side-show like the debate between Bill’s and Ken’s, the more we take our focus off the Gospel that Genesis 1 points to. The meaning is so rich as conveyed, it’s a shame we focus on surface details. Evolution can’t prove God didn’t create us, nor can Genesis 1 be used to say God didn’t use evolution.

In the end, what is the point of how God did it? The real point is He did, and He did it for a reason.

When’s the last time you did a study on Genesis 1 that didn’t end up focusing on evolution vs. creation?