1. I LOVE “Till We Have Faces” and “The Prydain Chronicles”!  I have read some George MacDonald but I find his work disturbing for some reason…I couldn’t put my finger on why.  Too surreal for my taste?  *shrug*  Most of these others I had never heard of before…

    • Jill Stengl says:

      My favorite MacDonald is “The Light Princess,” one of his short stories. I like The Princess and the Goblin, but the ending of The Princess and Curdie was downright bizarre. I haven’t read Phantastes for about thirty years, but I reread Lilith not long ago and was struck both by its brilliance and by the freakiness of his Universalist beliefs.

      Hannah Hurnard is another brilliant author who drifted into heretical beliefs in her later years. So sad! I haven’t been able to enjoy Hinds’ Feet on HIgh Places since I read Eagles Wings to Higher Places. 

    • Adam says:

      Bethany, glad to have found a fellow Til We Have Faces fan! Given it’s strangeness I am curious as to why MacDonald’s strangeness isn’t equally attractive? The Prydain Chronicles was foundational to my love of fantasy growing up, even moreso than Lewis or Tolkien (heretical, I know . . . .)

  2. Lacee Hogg says:

    Susan Cooper’s books are wonderful! I would agree they are not very “Christian,” but have a wonderful good vs. evil flavor to them. I wish that they were more well-known. 

    • Adam says:

      Lacee, you wouldn’t happen to know  what Cooper’s religious beliefs are you? I did some snooping around online but couldn’t find anything. If I had to guess, she’s either a Christian or a “lapsed” Christian from a high-church/liturgical church background she can’t quite shake. Since she’s British, I would guess Anglican.

  3. T.K. Wilson says:

    How about Brian Jaques’ Redwall series? He was a Catholic but his books are wonderful! I can’t say much for symbolism and theology because he wasn’t that kind of a writer but they are a fine alternative to most animal fantasy(Cough, Warriors,Cough cough)  excepting of course The Wind in the Willows.

    • Adam says:

      T.K., Redwall! I knew I would forget something . . . Yes, they are great. I only read the first seven or eight, but they were extremely enjoyable. Not even sure why I stopped, actually.

  4. T.K. Wilson says:

    Well, get back to it man! You’re missing out on real treats! I discovered Prydian pretty late, mostly because of the Black Cauldron movie that was off-limits in our house. I assumed in my trust of my parents that anything having to do with the Black Cauldron was bad so I stayed clear until late in high school, but they really are wonderful! Some of Mr. Alexander’s later books not so much (style slippage is all). I also enjoyed Till we have Faces finding it very interesting. I have always wanted to read the Adventures of Tom Bombadill but its like pulling hen’s teeth to find believe it or not! 

  5. Bainespal says:

    I recently read The Knight by George MacDonald.  I’m a little embarrassed to say that I didn’t completely love it as much as I probably should, given the massive props I’ve read about Gene Wolfe being “the best writer in the English language” and such.  I do like Wolfe’s mythic construction; the premise for the world of The Knight is very unique.  But I feel like the book is smarter than me, even though it is perfectly readable.  The narrative construction seems to detract from the full believability of the sub-creation, in my opinion.

    The Knight closely resembles Phantastes by George MacDonald.  I also read one of MacDonald’s short stories in junior high. 

    • Adam says:

      Bainespal, I’m assuming you meant to say that Gene Wolfe wrote The Knight. Wolfe is (like all the writer Wolfes – and they are a clan and a half) a deep author. There’s more in his books than I get on the first few passes. But that ought to be a challenge, not an off-limits sign. I always try to find work just a bit out of my reach and comprehension; it pushes me into further depths, forces me to figure stuff out. I’m unaware of a good literary guide to Wolfe’s works, however, more’s the pity. 

  6. Though I’m a Lewis fan, only recently have I read Till We Have Faces, and I enjoyed it just as much as all my TWHF friends were certain I would.

    The others, I must admit, I haven’t read, though my in-laws are huge Redwall fans.

  7. I list (as often as asked) Til We Have Faces as one of my favorites. I also love Lloyd Alexander’s Chronicles of Prydain. When I did a little research to see if I could include him as a Christian fantasy author, I found no information about his religious beliefs. The stories themselves seem to tell the tale of the Conquering King, but I could find no information to bolster the idea that Mr. Alexander equated his character with Jesus Christ. Maybe. But I couldn’t verify it.

    Is Stephen Lawhead too contemporary, or does he count?


    • Well, the other day I was going through the Library and noticed that if one goes all the way back — to the first book listed there, The Hobbit — the only authors listed as writing Christian fantasy are J. R. R. Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Madeleine L’Engle, and then Stephen Lawhead. So if one seeks an even four groundbreakers, that’s who they are.

    • Adam says:

      I don’t know much about him. But the criteria for “Christian novel” isn’t that the author thought his characters were Christ figures – at least, that’s not the criteria I’m using. They are certainly compatible thematically, anyway.

    • Adam says:

      I figured that most anybody reading this website would be aware of Lawhead. His Song of Albion trilogy was the most impactful of his on me, and I would recommend them wholeheartedly. The Skin Map set not so much.

  8. I could not understand Phantastes or Lilith until one day when I was looking through a book about symbols and read that the horse can represent man’s desire or ways. I suddenly realised that the books did not follow usual plot arcs because they were sermons!

    • chrisd says:

      I just finished Lillith. It was possibly the most bizarre book I have ever read. I am certain that there is rich symbolism throughout. But the main character was in love with a 15 year old, small person or not, did not sit well with this 21st century reader.

      If there is commentary on the book, it might be helpful. I’m going to look for the Princess and the Curdie as I’ve heard that it is very good. 

  9. D.M. Dutcher says:

    To understand Lilith, I think you need to get Christian Universalism. George MacDonald was a universalist, who believe that Christ’s sacrifice saved EVERYONE, regardless of personal assent:


    Lilith is an illustration of this. It’s all about how the only answer to sin is to die to live-to obey what we are told and then take up our place on the cold bowers under a healing moon. The more the protagonist struggles against it, the more he just hurts himself, and Lilith herself is a profound example of it-even in the end the first human rebel falls to grace. Lilith is my favorite book out of his works,  but I tend to the weird anyways.

    I’d also include Roger Elwood, mostly known for his Sf anthologies in the 70s, but Christian SF, F, and horror writer of books like Angelwalk, Dwellers, and others. He’s an uneasy hybrid of faith and some pretty dark themes.

    Also, Walter Miller and A Canticle for Leibowitz has to be read, as well as James Blish’s novels.  A VERY good fantasy series which is sadly out of print is Calvin Miller’s “Guardians of the Singreale”- it’s an incredible pair of books which upturn every single Christian spec-fic trope out there. His Singer trilogy of poetry is good too.

     Charles Williams, eh-he feels more like a theosophist with Christian window dressing on it, but that’s just my perspective.

  10. John says:

    Adam —
    Tim Powers is Roman Catholic (http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2005/tpowers_intvw_sept05.asp).
    James Blaylock was raised in the Presbyterian church (http://www.sybertooth.com/blaylock/intervew.htm), but I don’t know where he’s at today, though several of his books certainly seem to have Christian-ish themes/elements.
    Cordwainer Smith (Paul Linebarger) did work for military intelligence and developed psychological warfare, but I don’t know that it would be accurate to identify him as a “spy.”
    As for Lloyd Alexander, what makes you think that he might be a Christian?  I’ve never seen any indication of that.

What do you think?