1. Sherwood Smith says:

    *clapping hard*

  2. Maria Tatham says:

    Kaci, it’s great to listen to you rhapsodize!
    It seems that, as long as we cherish our mariner’s tools, and as long as a holy wind fills our sails, Christian writers and readers can navigate dangerous seas when asked to. Perhaps we are being asked to.
     
     
     
     
     

  3. Fred Warren says:

    Mom! Kaci’s digging in the back yard again!

  4. Johne Cook says:

    Brilliant post, Kaci. Thanks.

  5. Bob says:

    I want to go exploring with you.
    But a word of warning:
    I think you unleash the wrath of Christians when you make angels the heroes. I wrote a story for my granddaughter and disguised them under the name ‘Greatwings’ for that reason.

    • Kaci Hill says:

      It kinda depends. No one really screamed much over Touch By an Angel’s heroes, who were, in fact, the angels. At least, not that I’m aware of.   I definitely think there’s a right and wrong way to do everything, and I think mostly people get squeamish over anything that smells of angel-worship, which is a legitimate concern, as it’s happened. Personally, I change the name, too, but largely because I feel the word “angel” no longer invokes the respect it should.
       
      Btw, “Greatwings” is cool. Very cool. 0=)

  6. Great post, Kaci. I’m with you on the vampires, zombies thing, too. 😉

    Just for the sake of being controversial, let me raise a question. Yes, the supernatural world is real! What an important point and how necessary it is for us Christians to affirm that truth (God Himself, being supernatural, and all 😀 ). Certainly demons and angels can fill the pages of speculative fiction … certainly it can be done, but should it be done?

    I see two drawbacks to what we often refer to as supernatural suspense. 1) Our limited knowledge. We have little to go on from Scripture and there really isn’t another source book, which leaves us to our imagination and the second drawback. 2) If we adhere to Scripture we will be theologically sound, but limited in what we can do in our stories; if we let our imagination go, we will be inventing things about real beings which might lead people into false thinking.

    Case in point. In response to a YA Christian fantasy about supernatural beings, one letter writer thanked the author for making these Biblical things clear. Uh … the “Biblical things” were the author’s inventions.

    I like the approach Bob took. It’s one thing for an author to think, this is the way I imagine angels and I’ll call them Greatwings. But somehow saying, This is what angels are like and I’ll call them angels, in my mind, moves the story from speculative to historical or contemporary — precisely because we’re then talking about and identifying real beings. Just like historical figures need to be researched and accurately portrayed, it seems to me supernatural beings should be as well, hence limiting the actual speculation.

    But Greatwings. Now you can speculate all you want about Greatwings! (Can you tell, I like the name too> 😉 )

     

    Becky

  7. Kaci Hill says:

    Becky, I’d go with Eric Wilson’s Jerusalem’s Undead trilogy and John Olson’s Shade and Powers for vampire books.
     

    Just for the sake of being controversial, let me raise a question. Yes, the supernatural world is real! What an important point and how necessary it is for us Christians to affirm that truth (God Himself, being supernatural, and all ). Certainly demons and angels can fill the pages of speculative fiction … certainly it can be done, but should it be done?

     
    I say yes, but let’s play.

    I see two drawbacks to what we often refer to as supernatural suspense. 1) Our limited knowledge.  We have little to go on from Scripture and there really isn’t another source book, which leaves us to our imagination and the second drawback.

    Scripture has a ton you can pull if you glean the interactions to be had. Now that you’ve mentioned it, I’ve got it in my head to go do a comparison study of the angels and demons in Scripture. That’ll be fun. I really don’t have a problem with using people’s personal accounts with the supernatural, keeping in mind such a study probably requires a ton of prayer.

    2) If we adhere to Scripture we will be theologically sound, but limited in what we can do in our stories; if we let our imagination go, we will be inventing things about real beings which might lead people into false thinking.

    I think there’s still plenty of room to not breach the sound barrier (had to, hehe) while speculating.  

    Case in point. In response to a YA Christian fantasy about supernatural beings, one letter writer thanked the author for making these Biblical things clear. Uh … the “Biblical things” were the author’s inventions.

    Two things:
    1. I agree authors should be conscientious. People are weird.
    2. I think if a reader checks their brain at the cover, it’s their own fault.
    To further the answer, though,  I can think of plenty writers who did use angels and demons, and, in fact, either set the tone for such genre or used the pioneers of said genre as their guides. 
    Yes, changing names allows much more room for speculating with much less room for error, but I might have to counter, Becky, that I’m pretty sure a reader could quickly figure out what the renamed being is — thus not necessarily fixing things.
     

    I like the approach Bob took. It’s one thing for an author to think, this is the way I imagine angels and I’ll call them Greatwings.

     
    Bob is cool. I want to read this story now. 
     

    But somehow saying, This is what angels are like and I’ll call them angels, in my mind, moves the story from speculative to historical or contemporary — precisely because we’re then talking about and identifying real beings. Just like historical figures need to be researched and accurately portrayed, it seems to me supernatural beings should be as well, hence limiting the actual speculation.

     
    I’ll give you that, yes, writers should strive to be as accurate as possible. The truth is, though, there’s still plenty of room to play.  I mean, if  I had angels behaving like demons, okay, we might have an issue. But whether or not angels can walk through walls is negotiable.

  8. Timothy Stone says:

    Wow Ma’am! I appreciated your honest and balanced look Scripturally at such an issue. I most wanted to tell you that you wrote so beautifully. I was honestly carried along. You have been given such a great gift by God. Keep it up Ma’am. 🙂 Just wow! Great writing!
     

  9. Off topic, sort of, except that you mentioned Buffy.

    My daughter and I watch Buffy on Netflix. And it has brought up so many topics for us to discuss that wouldn’t normally come up.

    I started watching Buffy because of this remix and the fact that I was tired of seeing women portrayed as weak victims in much fiction.



    I like strong male characters. I also like strong female characters.
    I also want my daughters to avoid bad relationships and see warped, stalker-love for what it is.            

    • Kaci Hill says:

      Hahaha. I’ve seen that! It’s awesome. I sent it to a friend who loves Twilight. I only watched a few random episodes of Buffy, but enough to appreciate the humor of the video.  I wholly agree with you on strong male and female characters and avoiding bad relationships. 

  10. Kaci Hill says:

    Also, thanks for all the encouraging words, everyone.

  11. Maria Tatham says:

    Kaci, everyone, did you receive an email with promo materials for Brian Godawa’s novel NOAH PRIMEVAL? This book, the first in a planned series of three, is about what Genesis 6:1 and following may have been like. 

    Maria

  12. Nikole Hahn says:

    I never thought of Halloween in that way or the Bible in that way. Wow. Powerful post.

What do you think?