1. You make a good point here, John. 1 Thess 5:23 indicates that God cares about our soul, spirit AND body. As a reflection of our Creator, we are triune beings.

  2. R. L. Copple says:

    Agreed! The body is redeemed with the soul. Even Jesus ascended with His body, glorified though it may have been. It isn’t in the plan to get rid of them.
     

  3. Becky says:

    This makes me wonder what a perfect and perfectly united body and soul looks like? Sometimes it does seem like, in this fallen world, the one is fighting against the other.

    • I think that’s absolutely true, because we know that Christ’s plan for His people is to accomplish redemption/resurrection as a two-stage process. First the soul/spirit, and then the body. At present the body only seems more evil because it’ll be the last to be resurrected, and while our souls/spirits are going up and up, the body — at present — is going down and down, “groaning” with the world until the resurrection (Rom. 8).

  4. Revynn says:

    I just finished reading Randy Alcorn’s book on heaven (titled, unexpectedly, “Heaven”) and he spends a great deal of time on this exact point. He calls it “Christoplatonism”, the idea that spiritual is good and physical is bad, therefore heaven is a boring and endless session of sitting on a cloud strumming a harp. 
    In fact, the rejection of this gnostic belief forms the basis for most of the book. Is your digestive system a product of sin? No, so why wouldn’t we eat in heaven? Is the desire to learn and study and create a product of fallen physical bodies? No, so why wouldnt we pursue the arts and sciences in heaven?
    Its a good read. 

    • SpecFaith readers can tell you: I’m quite the Heaven fan. It is, however, only a great start to rediscovering the wondrous truth that God is indeed redeeming everything — minus (for this wonderful doctrine has been abused) the sobering fact that those who free-willfully reject Him and never repent are not included in this redemption.

      • Tim Frankovich says:

        I recommend the Heaven book more than any other book on my shelf. I have three copies so that I have extras to loan out. 

  5. John, Thank you for writing this article! I find myself in my own messages and conversations being very intentional to talk about both the New Heaven and the New Earth in a glorified, resurrected body. Your article is so helpful in refocusing our thoughts!
    Thank you!

  6. HG Ferguson says:

    John’s first entire epistle was written to combat Gnosticism in its different First Century forms, which are essentially still with us today.  Not to mention the bomb he dropped in John 1:1 — “En archey eyn ho Logos, kai ho Logos eyn pros ton Theon, kai Theos eyn ho Logos” followed by John 1:14 “Kai ho Logos SARX egeneto” — I transliterated the Koine Greek to make the point.  This Logos, this Word, which was both with God and the same in character and essence as God — Spirit, Pneuma — became FLESH — the death blow to all forms of Gnosticism then as well as now.  Jesus Christ was a complete, total and full human in every sense.  He had a body just like ours — “that which we have seen with our eyes, what we beheld, what our hands touched” — no wispy incorporeal Christ here.  The eternal Logos, begotten not made, took a human body to redeem the whole man, as this magnificent post so ably demonstrates.

  7. notleia says:

    Ehhhhhhhhhhh, I’m gonna get all heretical and question whether it is indeed a bodily resurrection in the not-quite-zombies sense. There’s quite a bit of room for interpretation. For one, human flesh and animal flesh — or at least mammalian — is more similar than different, but I can’t blame Paul because he didn’t have modern science.
    But I think dualism has a lot of interesting points, minus the Calvin-ish disdain for the physical. How much is physical and how much is spiritual? Natural or supernatural, etc?

What do you think?