1. Pam Halter says:

    When I first started going to conferences waaaay back in 1997, this is what I learned: if a buyer likes the title, they’ll pull the book off the shelf and look at the cover. Then, if they like the cover, they’ll turn it over and read the back cover copy. If that interests them, they’ll open up to the first chapter. If the first page grabs them, they’ll probably buy the book.

    I’m a wine lover, and I have my favorites, but I have to admit I sometimes buy a bottle based on the label. Just did that today. Some of those labels are works of art! And I make wine bottle lights, so wine labels are important to me.

    And why do you think cook books have pictures? I know that doesn’t constitute cover art, but pictures show the finished product.

    So, yes, book covers are incredibly important. Man looks on the outward appearance, right? And that’s not just with people. We read with our eyes first (no pun intended). We drink wine first with our eyes. We eat first with our eyes. But like Becky said, if the story doesn’t deliver, that will reflect in reviews. Then it won’t matter how wonderful the cover is.

  2. Sparksofember says:

    I think book covers are extremely important. A low-quality book might have a fantastic cover – and so the reader may avoid sequels expecting the same quality contents – but they still picked it up that first time, often directly because of the cover. If a fantastic book has a horrible cover, then it will be missing out by many who are never drawn to even read the premise. For one, a low quality cover is going to imply low-quality contents regardless of what’s actually inside. 

    The same goes for covers that target too specific a demographic when the contents might appeal to a wider audience. I’m curious if publishers seem to target women more because they assume women buy/read more or if they are catering to an untrue stereotype.

    Though I have seen examples of the opposite occurring, too. Books I might enjoy but a cover that scares me off, implying too much violence, or just something I wouldn’t want my daughter or husband to see. And if it’s something my family who knows me might misunderstand, what do I expect from the secular world who sees the cover.

     

  3. AshleeW says:

    I’ve worried that my cover for The Word Changers would appeal too largely to girls. I have a son and am very conscious about books appealing to both girls and boys. However, the protagonist of my book is a girl and I realize the story itself will naturally appeal to girls in general.

    But … I went to a book event at a public school this past week and was amazed at the number of teen boys who not only showed interest in, but purchased, my book. One of them even came up to me about 10 minutes after buying it to inform me he had read the first chapter and was loving it! That was so awesome for me to hear.

    My next books will feature a male protagonist, therefore I have much different plans for the covers. I am targeting boys for sure on these…! 🙂

    • notleia says:

      Call me shallow, but I thought the guy on the original cover looked like a goober. Or that slightly stoned, driver’s license look, like he’d been waiting in the DMV for the last forty minutes and the counter person finally said standheretakeoffyourglasseslookatthecamera.

  4. David F says:

    Totally agree that covers are important because of the message they send. In fact when I was reading “The Light Of Eidon” on a plane flight, I actually taped plain paper over the book’s cover since it looked to me so much like a somewhat trashy romance novel, and that was going to give completely the wrong impression to the people around me. Sad, since I appreciate that series so much…

  5. dmdutcher says:

    Considering it’s probably a 75-25% split of female to male readers anyways, they’d gain more than they’d lose. I think though the reason why there are so many girl in dress covers is that it’s expensive, time consuming,  and hard to get good illustrations for an indie author or small press, but relatively cheap to shoot a girl in a dress and put her on a photoshopped or stock footage background.

  6. Kathy E says:

    This isn’t about cover art, it’s about a different aesthetic: the *feel* of the cover. Most paperbacks have a shiny, slick feel. Some, however, have a more textured, suede-like feel that “reads” dirty to my fingers. Almost feel like I need a damp cloth to wipe them off – and this is with a brand new book! How many buyers might be put off subliminally by that feel and not buy the book? Anybody else have thoughts on this aspect?

    • Sparksofember says:

      With the rise of ebooks, I would think aesthetic feel should be less and less of a concern. While there are books that may be less pleasing to the touch, often the judgement is passed from a glance, before the book is handled physically.

  7. Kat says:

    If I’m picking up a book by an author I’ve never read before, a really good cover will catch my eye, as will a good title. In the case of urban fantasies, a cover will sometimes tell me I don’t want to read the book.

  8. Tracey says:

    I agree, covers are really important! I’ve bought a book with a gorgeous cover, only to find the contents were less than polished. It’s rare for me to go the other way, though, because a low-budget cover does seem to advertise a low-quality story. Maybe that’s not fair, but it’s the impression I get . . . and enough books have proven me right that I hesitate to put money into a bad-cover novel.

    Not an expert on what makes a cover look professional either, but cheap fonts and bad Photoshop jobs are usually a turnoff.

    I, for one, didn’t see much of a problem with the Guardian-King covers. And I adore Anne Elisabeth Stengl’s! They do seem to appeal mostly to girls, though, and I wish more males would give them a chance.

  9. J. S. Bailey says:

    I don’t pay too much attention to covers, though if the cover looks like it was drawn by a toddler using Microsoft Paint, then I’m probably not going to read the book. 🙂

  10. Lisa says:

    I totally agree that covers are important. Very important. I would be much more inclined to pick up Ashlee’s book with the new cover than with the old. I know, it’s not fair! But it’s so true. I have a really hard time purchasing a book if the cover is cheesy, amateurish, photoshopped, etc. Even when I KNOW the writing is good! I just can’t stand it!

    All of which to say I have some angst about possible covers for my own book. If  I have to go the self-published route because no publishers will take it I’ll have to face this…I have thought a lot about the cover, and how to get a good one on a limited budget. But it’s one of the things I’m willing to splurge a little on.

  11. Julie D says:

    Anything that looks like paranormal romance (girl in dress, shadows) will turn me right off.

  12. Great conversation. With Ashlee I was wondering if her knew cover, which I think is beautiful, will mostly draw women readers. After I gasped and oohhed and ahhed a bit, I then thought, oh, but the male character isn’t in the picture any more.

    David F, thanks for validating my point about Karen Hancock’s books. I was still in my “don’t notice the cover” phase, but once how “romance-y” they look, I realized how that could keep guys from even picking the books up. The ironic thing is that the female character on the cover of The Light Of Eidon, is Abramm’s sister.

    And I’ll admit, like the rest of you a cover that looks low budget dissuades me from buying a book for the reason you mentioned—if the cover looks cheap, can the writing be better? I have a writer friend whose first self-published book I only just recently purchased because I didn’t think the cover was particularly attractive. And as you said, Lisa, I knew my friend is a good writer!

    Tracy, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Anne Elisabeth Stengl’s covers. I just think they largely give the message, This is a book for women. I’m not a guy so I can’t say, but I think the fantasy is so awesome, that the world is so imaginative, I’d think guys would enjoy the books too. And it’s not like there aren’t important male characters. Very important male characters! But I don’t know that the covers would tell men that.

    As far as the feel of book covers, Kathy, I prefer the ones that feel . . . textured, maybe a little like leather. But I agree with sparksofember, as digital reading becomes more prevalent, texture of cover (and paper) will be less and less important. I will say that the covers I don’t like are the ones that are so thick they aren’t pliable and that nearly cut my skin as I hold them. I’ve had a number of POD books with covers like that.

    And yes, covers can be turnoffs. I read some writing article recently, from a general market author. I considered subscribing to her site because I like what she said. Then I looked at her sidebar where there were pictures of her covers—almost all racy romance scenes with half-clothed people. I decided not to subscribe! Ha! So I guess I take the cake as the shallow one here.

    Becky

  13. Tim Frankovich says:

    I well remember The Light of Eidon cover controversy, back when I was reviewing. Bethany House took strong notice of it, to their credit, and at the time, actually sent me several proposed covers for the second book to get my opinion as a fantasy fiction lover.

    I am absolutely in love with the Tales of Goldstone Wood. While I think the covers are gorgeous in and of themselves, I have found myself repeatedly telling male readers to ignore the covers and enjoy the beautiful stories that celebrate both genders and their distinctive desires and quirks.

  14. Sparksofember says:

    It’s funny about The Light of Eidon being such a hotspot. I first saw it at the local library a few years ago while looking for Aurthurian fiction for my husband and never once thought it was a romance – in fact, I took note of it immediately because it looked like something I thought he would enjoy. (Now book #3 – Shadow Over Kiriath – that looks like a romance!)

  15. Julie D says:

    Another thing I appreciate about Stengl’s covers is that they’re all unified. The latter ones aren’t published by the same company as the first,  but the covers all still match. I have a few other book-posters, but Stengl’s novels are ones I would have framed if I could.

What do you think?