1. Kirsty says:

    Hey, thanks for flagging up the audio series. I heard some of them on the Radio a few years ago, and enjoyed them. As I did the first book, although I couldn’t get into the second one, as the writing style irritated me so much. (I don’t agree with the view of endtimes either, but it’s fantasy after all!)
     
    I’m always listening to BBC audio dramas/comedies while I’m working, but there are only so many of those that I want to listen to. I think these will last me a while!

  2. I didn’t know that the radio drama team had produced those! That, alone, assures me of their quality. Their adapt of the Horse and his Boy, with the perfect horsey-sounding voice actors, was better than any movie.
     
    That said, Left Behind just isn’t _bad enough_. It’s the end of the world, and any Frank Peretti novel worth its stuff has badder stuff happening. Heck, I’ve read _fanfics_ with a more horrifying apocalypse. There were originally only supposed to be 7 books, so that’s as far as I read. Then it had so obviously become a cash cow that I abandoned the series and never looked back. :-p

    • Most people, including my wife, abandoned the series at just past its halfway point — just when things were getting more “speculative,” though still with restraints.

      A clarification: the same production engineers behind several of the Radio Theatre dramas — e.g. sound effects and editing wizards — produced the Left Behind audio series. For Radio Theatre, the actors and some other engineers (especially in the U.K.) were very different, and certainly so are the storytelling genres.

  3. I’m actually a premillennial dispensationalist (if such labels are any use at all), and I could not get through the first chapter of LEFT BEHIND. The whole idea of the series makes me feel queasy, to be honest. Because I think it opens up a number of very important and serious Biblical doctrines to misunderstanding and confusion, gives needless offence and fodder for ridicule to those outside the faith, and makes it all too easy for even earnest Christians to mistake the authors’ speculations for gospel, so to speak. The fact is, we simply don’t know the specific details of how or when the end times are going to play out and what all the symbols in Revelation really mean, and I think it’s less damaging for a Christian novelist to write about the Zombie Apocalypse than to try and describe what they think the Biblical Apocalypse will be like and get it embarrassingly wrong. (Hal Lindsey, I’m looking at you.)
    I’m glad that LEFT BEHIND inspired you to get interested in speculative fiction — that’s good to hear. But I still wish that the series had never been written, and after seeing some reviews of the later books, I’m not sorry I didn’t force myself to keep reading them.

    • Kirsty says:

      I think a lot of the problem is it’s not portrayed as fiction but this is how it will really be.
       
      That’s one thing I liked about Chris Walley’s series. I don’t agree with that eschatological view either (actually I have no fixed views at all). However, although it is the view the author would favour, he makers it clear in the little note at the front that he is not saying ‘this is definitely how it will be’ (sorry, don’t have the book to hand). From his site:

      these books are, above all, novels. Their purpose is simply to tell a tale that will, hopefully, intrigue, engross and please readers. Although they are based on a post-millennial theology they were not written in order to popularise that particular view of the ‘End Times’ and they are certainly not ‘fictionalised theology’. […] although the books are based on a particular theological position that I think has lot going for it, I am no dogmatic and confrontational holder of this position. I hold my views cautiously and provisionally and I am prepared to accept I am wrong. I will be delighted (if a little surprised) if I am raptured tomorrow.

      The spiritual lessons we do get from his books will be of benefit to us whatever actually happens at the end of the world! Because at the end of the day, it makes little difference to our lives whether there’s the risk of being raptured tomorrow or not. We equally might be run over by a bus.
       

    • I’m actually a premillennial dispensationalist (if such labels are any use at all), and I could not get through the first chapter of LEFT BEHIND.

      Oddly enough, it wasn’t until the very last of the series — Kingdom Come — that I began to question the notion of premillennialism. I’m not sure whether the other two views (post- and a-) make any more sense than pre-. However, when set to the “music” of fiction, pre- makes no sense at all. Clearly there becomes no point in God’s redemptive His-Story to have a literal 1,000-year period after Jesus comes back and before the final transformation into the New Earth (though some ignore this) just to prove that — what? people still stink? the Devil is still bad?

      And that was a little bit of snark. Perhaps even belief in a literal seven-year Tribulation, with the “Rapture” at any point (splitting the Second Coming into two phases), could ignore a literal Millennium. Why hasn’t anyone come up with a hybrid view of dispensational amillennialism? That might be a fun one. 😀

      The whole idea of the series makes me feel queasy, to be honest.

      I’d heard of this response before, including from readers wide open to other fantasy tales, including secular ones. To be honest, this perplexes me, and I’d love to hear more about the reasons behind the queasiness. Does the very idea of a series like Left Behind — ignoring for now whether the execution was well-done — seem to infringe on dangerous territory? If so, then perhaps I was in a different position then, and in an even better position now. Having now a post-pre-tribulational view (ha!) I can enjoy the books more as a straight fantasy simulation of the End Times.

      Because I think it opens up a number of very important and serious Biblical doctrines to misunderstanding and confusion, gives needless offence and fodder for ridicule to those outside the faith, and makes it all too easy for even earnest Christians to mistake the authors’ speculations for gospel, so to speak.

      Similar things happened with Frank Peretti, though. All these authors made it clear they were simply asking what-if. Yet many Christian readers simply didn’t understand fiction — and so they believed demons could be named after diseases, or the Antichrist would really have a name like Nicolae Carpathia and brainwashing powers. If more Christian leaders taught about exploring fiction for God’s glory, we might not have this problem. But instead Christian readers either believed this is how it really is! or else condemned the novelists for supposedly promoting this.

      In that case, the fault lies not in the authors, but the readers.

      The fact is, we simply don’t know the specific details of how or when the end times are going to play out and what all the symbols in Revelation really mean, and I think it’s less damaging for a Christian novelist to write about the Zombie Apocalypse than to try and describe what they think the Biblical Apocalypse will be like and get it embarrassingly wrong. (Hal Lindsey, I’m looking at you.)

      I still recall reading Lindsey’s older books after hearing my first dispensational pre-everything-ist sermon series, from Dr. David Jeremiah, and being interested in the Left Behind series (including LaHaye’s explain-all-the-end-times-things books). And yes, I agree Lindsey’s works had far too much impact. Even according to pre-everything-ist literature, he allegorized far too much: the demon locusts were Russians, the demon horsemen were Russians, the oceans turned to blood because of radiation dumped by Russians, pretty much everything was caused by Russians.

      (And pre-everything-ist folks get irked at a-mills for “spiritualizing” Revelation?)

      Then President Reagan whooped the Russians, and singly prevented the Apocalypse According to Hal Lindsey. That durn Reagan. Or wait! Thanks, President Reagan!

      I’m glad that LEFT BEHIND inspired you to get interested in speculative fiction — that’s good to hear. But I still wish that the series had never been written, and after seeing some reviews of the later books, I’m not sorry I didn’t force myself to keep reading them.

      Most people are convinced the earlier books were better. So far, I’m sticking with my original view that the later ones are actually superior, at least from a speculative standpoint. They milked the series? It’s a seven-year Tribulation; it makes sense, at least theoretically, to take a while to explore it. The later books were too pulpy? I just finished listening to book 1, and the pulp was there all along; that book covers only one week, maybe two, after the Rapture, in which small space the world and grieving people recover from the Rapture and the Antichrist comes from nowhere to take over the United Nations. So you have to enjoy the pulp, if you can, all along.

      • Kirsty says:

        Similar things happened with Frank Peretti, though. All these authors made it clear they were simply asking what-if. Yet many Christian readers simply didn’t understand fiction

        I think the problem, though, is that they don’t make it clear. (In fact, in the case of Left Behind, I get the impression they really are writing fictionalised theology, not simply asking what if?).  I know Frank Piretti was not expecting it to be taken as true theology – but there is nothing in the actual books to make this clear.
         
        Obviously if a book is set in another world, or about something fictional like fairies there can be no confusion. But when set in this world, and involving only real things – angels, demons, the second coming – the natural assumption when reading is that this is how the author believes the world really is. I don’t see how that’s the fault of the reader.

  4. Lex Keating says:

    I sense a disturbance in the Force…
     
    Yes, Cage is constantly on the prowl for material that will allow him to lead where no one can follow, but this sounds like trouble. Like your wife, I abandoned the books partway through. (I’d read the source material, which I found more compelling and interesting than the human plot twists.) However, I appreciate the discussion and interest the fiction generated. I’m curious about the audio now, because I’m a fan of Chris Fabry. (77 Habits of Highly Ineffective Christians remains my favorite.)

  5. Galadriel says:

    I’ve been getting into audio dramas even more recently–some of the older Adventures in Odyssey, BBC Radio Four Extra adaptations of Terry Prachett, BBC Cabin Pressure, and Big Finish Doctor Who serials. It’s actually easier to produce good radio than film in my mind, and the Focus adaptions of  Narnia are superior to the Walden films most of the time.

  6. Christian Jaeschke says:

    I  read the books and found them incredibly long-winded and poorly-written, also the lengthy show-stopping sermons proved silly and counter-intuitive for fiction but I was curious to see what happened, so I read all 12 books. I guess I’m a glutton for punishment. I found Aslan to be a much better Jesus than Book 12’s Cardboard Jesus. That said, this audio theatre edition seems an improvement on the books (judging by the 2 ‘episodes’ I’ve listened to). Good stuff!

  7. D.M. Dutcher says:

    Audio drama can be fun. If you can scare up a copy, National Public Radio did an absolutely wonderful version of Star Wars, using members from the original cast. There’s plenty of free, older drama too at places like the internet archive. I’m not a big Left Behind fan, but it could only get better if adapted into one.
    I can’t understand why on earth Arclight pictures would choose Nicholas Cage though.  He’s legendary for bad acting. NOT THE BEES ARRRGGHBLARG! I AM A VAMPIRE! They might as well invite the Slacktivist and make him creative consultant while they are at it.

What do you think?