1. Kessie says:

    Reminds me of that quote from Unbreakable: “But he says there’s always two kinds; there’s the soldier villain – who fights the hero with his hands; and then there’s the real threat – the brilliant and evil archenemy – who fights the hero with his mind.”
     
    I happen to adore my villains, usually to a fault, so I try to construct them so they repulse me or scare me. Because if they make me feel that way, they’ll make the reader feel that way. I think my scariest villain was the Evil Mastermind type who showed up at the beginning and at the end. In between, the heroes were simply caught in a massive war that the mastermind was waging against all the world. Although they heard the mastermind’s voice and saw his plots unfold, they never saw him again until the end, when they finally figured out his one weakness and killed him (via lava. It was a fun story).
     
    But other villains have proven too interesting and likeable to remain villains. I had a robot who despised the hero, because the robot was a copy of him. They battled for years until the hero finally defeated the robot. The robot was repaired by a faithful minion, but the robot had nothing else to live for, since he had been defeated. Then, for some reason, the minion gave the robot a small pet, and the robot’s entire outlook changed. And he began the long, slow process through the gray area toward the ‘hero’ side.
     
    I love villains! They have to be more powerful than the heroes, because a villain less powerful than the heroes is not a threat. 🙂

  2. Galadriel says:

    Okay, I’ll be honest–I like the questionable villians, just because they make the hero’s life much more complicated.  If there’s a chance of the villian reforming, it makes it much harder to bury that sword in his chest.

  3.  In Dragon, for example (which I love), the Vikings had misunderstood the dragons and simply needed to coexist with them. Yet why not apply this same principle to the kingpin dragon at the end? How did they know that creature wasn’t also oppressed and needed to be given a chance?

    Mind. Blown.

    Thanks for a great nuts & bolts article with a spiritual angle.     

  4. Kaci Hill says:

    What would this order say about how we think? Of course, you may suggest a revision. In what order would you place those enemies? What enemy categories would you add?

     
    The thing about villains like the Joker are that they are wholly and irrevocably evil. I can’t say that simply understanding a villain makes him sympathetic or likeable, because I find myself, as I’ve said before, a weird person who will understand motives and still feel no mercy toward the character.  That said, what frightens me about the villains I understand is that they remind me how I could be.
     

    The enemies who seemed obvious simply weren’t the real bad guys.

     
    It’s not that they aren’t bad guys; they just aren’t the ones responsible…this time. 
     

    Other times, the hero’s response to the villains is flat-out confusing. Assuming here a mostly upright, straightforward protagonist, such a hero can easily figure who are the real villains who will not change, and who are the disadvantaged types who are simply oppressed or taking orders from the real bad guy. Meanwhile audience members are either left to wonder how the hero can tell the difference, or else think they’re certain they can know a difference simply because they’re told there is difference.

     
    Or it doesn’t matter who the ‘worst’ bad guy is when they’re all guilty. I think this is one where smaller-scale stories work better than giant epic stories: It’s not a matter of battling through levels of Bad Guy Hierarchy as finding out which guy’s targeting the protagonist. There’s a Leverage episode that specifically deals with that: The team, themselves not ‘the good guys’ start helping one guy only to learn he’s worse than they are and the guy they’re after isn’t any better. It becomes a moral decision: Keep going and let the client go, back out, or take down both.
     
     

    • Maria Tatham says:

      Kaci, you wrote:

      “…I can’t say that simply understanding a villain makes him sympathetic or likeable, because I find myself, as I’ve said before, a weird person who will understand motives and still feel no mercy toward the character. That said, what frightens me about the villains I understand is that they remind me how I could be.”

      Good analysis of your own thinking; and, interesting insight–yes, without grace, we could be!

  5. Maria Tatham says:

    Stephen, it sounds like you’re planning to say that human nature itself is the enemy. That is true, but only in part, as you know.

    Perhaps the reason why we have so much trouble with human villains, with identifying them, or identifying with them, or liking or pitying them, is because of what Ephesians 6:12 states:

    “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”   

    Sometimes we do see an absolute villain, such as the Joker, or Sauron. But the big guys are unholy angels, angelic majesties, demons.  

  6. Stephen, it sounds like you’re planning to say that human nature itself is the enemy. That is true, but only in part, as you know.

    Definitely! Scripture seems to mention three villains we must beware. The first you have already guessed, and is the focus of this series. The others are the Devil/demons, and the world — that is, the sin and sinful consequences of others’ sinful natures, or “flesh.”

    My goal is not to downplay the other sources of evil we must fight, and which great stories show us. Rather, it’s to question why we tend to emphasize External villains, not the flesh.

    My guess is because we prefer the devil we know to the exterior (and real) Devil we don’t.

    But if I were the Devil, one of my greatest triumphs would be exaggerating my powers and gladly accepting “blame” for sin, while for many people, the worst evils come from within.

  7. Maria Tatham says:

    Yes, terrible things come from within! Yes, we must see that, and remain vigilant!

What do you think?