1. COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Terri Main
    URL: http://www.wayfarersjournal.com
    DATE: 4/22/2008 3:19:53 AM
    I happen to like mixed genre stories. My own work in progress is science-fiction mystery. I would call The Begotten supernatural historical suspense. There’s a small romantic component, but it is a very small part of the story.

    I do have a few concerns theologically with the story and I’ll be blogging about that tommorrow at http://www.wayfarersjournal.com/blog.htm .
    —–

    COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Rebecca LuElla Miller
    DATE: 4/23/2008 7:05:01 PM
    Ah, yes, the theology of a story. That is certainly an issue Christian writers must deal with. Some of the most strident criticisms of Sharon Hinck’s The Restorer centered on the worship practices (or lack thereof) in her created world.

    With supernatural suspense, there is a larger problem—depicting angels and demons who are actual, created beings. How closely must a writer stay with Scripture?

    I suggest, very close, just as would be required in any historical novel.

    But perhaps that’s not even close to the concerns you had, Terri. I’ll be interested to read your post.

    Becky
    —–

    COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Terri Main
    URL: http://www.wayfarersjournal.com/blog.htm
    DATE: 4/23/2008 7:25:23 PM
    I have the essay up on my blog. I have another essay to write which addresses in general the place of theological “correctness” in speculative fiction writing when it is appropriate when it is not so important. However, I’m not feeling well today, so I’ll let it go until tomorrow, but the basic idea comes down to how close to reality your story is.

    Let’s use history as an example. If you are writing a horror story that is set in Victorian London which you say is on the Danube river, you have a problem. Why? Because that is not accurate to the historical setting in the real world. People expect that to be accurate. On the other hand if the story takes place in an alternate universe where the Thames is called the Danube for some reason, then people buy into it because that is something given the contract the reader makes with the author they can accept as part of the fantasy.

    So it is with theology. The closer to reality your setting and plot, the more the reader expects the theology to be defensible. If I create a planet where God revealed himself through a type of sentient plant life and I have a theology based on that plant life, the reader will go along with me because of the universe I have created. However, if I set the story in a “real” time and place like 14th C. Italy, then there is an expectation that the theology will be that of this world.

    Likewise, the reader will be able to suspend theological disbelief about the existence of certain mythical beings like werewolves and vampires, dragons and pixies, existing in this time and place, if the rest of the theology is supported. Why? Because they know this is not an attempt to create a realistic story.

    Historical fiction which includes a supernatural element, particularly one in which the historical detail is so generally accurate is so close to a real world setting, and one in which historical questions of sound doctrine are being debated with the clear assumption that the heroes are possessed of the truth, you need to be scrupulous about your theology.
    —–

    COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Rebecca LuElla Miller
    URL: http://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/
    DATE: 4/28/2008 6:51:20 PM
    Terri, this is excellent! I love the clear delineation you make.

    Interestingly, one trend in fantasy today is to include the fantasy elements in a real world setting. So we have the real Thames and London and God and the Bible, with fantasy elements X, Y, and Z. I think this mixture may cloud theological issues.

    I tend to think however, when it comes to the Bible and things the Bible addresses, there should be less latitude.

    Becky
    —–

What do you think?