1. Stephen, I may be talking past you on this topic, but it seems to me there’s a significant difference in our positions. Using the real life situations you mentioned above, I’d say God received glory, no doubt, but because of what He did, not because of the sin the people did. Hence, their actions aren’t glorifying Him. His power and wisdom and goodness to redeem evil intentions or judge a hard heart is what brings Him glory.

    So, too, with stories. How He uses them glorifies Him. A sinful man writing lies about God does not glorify God. He may choose to use those stories at some point in time in ways we can’t imagine or as a catalyst for judgment. But we live in space and time, and what we see from stories like Phillip Pullman’s slander against God is … slander against God!

    Avatar is another more recent example. The images of the divine in that movie were heretical. Yet some people have said they understand the incarnation better because of it. That’s God’s work, God’s doing, not the movie makers who clearly made nature divine and espoused any number of pseudo-Eastern mystical ideas.

    Nobody ought to say that story glorified God. It slandered Him, lied about Him, gave all kinds of false ideas about His world and the way it works.

    Did God glorify Himself in and through Avatar the way He did through Pharaoh? No. Has He glorified Himself through the movie in the lives of select individuals? Apparently. Will He glorify Himself when He brings those who do not repentant to judgment? Definitely.

    In the meantime, what do we see? A movie that slanders God, not one that brings Him glory.

    Becky

What do you think?